Bug #56715 | Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 10 Sep 2010 14:32 | Modified: | 20 Nov 2010 22:51 |
Reporter: | Dmitry Lenev | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Locking | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.5.6-m3 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | Dmitry Lenev | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[10 Sep 2010 14:32]
Dmitry Lenev
[10 Sep 2010 22:40]
Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the report. Verified as described.
[23 Sep 2010 20:04]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/118974 3142 Dmitry Lenev 2010-09-23 A better fix for bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector", which doesn't introduce bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors". Deadlock could have occurred when workload containing mix of DML, DDL and FLUSH TABLES statements affecting same set of tables was executed in heavily concurrent environment. This deadlock occurred when several connections tried to perform deadlock detection in metadata locking subsystem. The first connection started traversing wait-for graph, encountered sub-graph representing wait for flush, acquired LOCK_open and dived into sub-graph inspection. When it has encountered sub-graph corresponding to wait for metadata lock and blocked while trying to acquire rd-lock on MDL_lock::m_rwlock protecting this subgraph, since some other thread had wr-lock on it. When this wr-lock was released it could have happened (if there was other pending wr-lock against this rwlock) that rd-lock from the first connection was left unsatisfied but at the same time new rd-lock request from the second connection sneaked in and was satisfied (for this to be possible second rd- request should come exactly after wr-lock is released but before pending wr-lock manages to grab rwlock, which is possible both on Linux and in our own rwlock implementation). If this second connection continued traversing wait-for graph and encountered sub-graph representing wait for flush it tried to acquire LOCK_open and thus deadlock was created. The previous patch tried to workaround this problem by not allowing deadlock detector to lock LOCK_open mutex if some other thread doing deadlock detection already owns it and current search depth is greater than 0. Instead deadlock was reported. As result it has introduced bug #56715. This patch solves this problem in a different way. It introduces a new rw_pr_lock_t implementation to be used by MDL subsystem instead of one based on Linux rwlocks or our own rwlock implementation. This new implementation never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock. Thus situation which has caused this bug becomes impossible with it. Due to fact that this implementation is optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests. Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. No test case is provided as this bug is very hard to repeat in MTR environment but is repeatable with the help of RQG tests. This patch also doesn't include test for bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors" as it takes too much time to be run as part of normal test-suite runs. QQ: Should we also remove support for preferring readers from my_rw_lock_t implementation? @ config.h.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.in We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ include/my_pthread.h Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. @ mysys/thr_rwlock.c Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used.
[27 Sep 2010 7:47]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/119140 3142 Dmitry Lenev 2010-09-27 A better fix for bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector", which doesn't introduce bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors". Deadlock could have occurred when workload containing mix of DML, DDL and FLUSH TABLES statements affecting same set of tables was executed in heavily concurrent environment. This deadlock occurred when several connections tried to perform deadlock detection in metadata locking subsystem. The first connection started traversing wait-for graph, encountered sub-graph representing wait for flush, acquired LOCK_open and dived into sub-graph inspection. When it has encountered sub-graph corresponding to wait for metadata lock and blocked while trying to acquire rd-lock on MDL_lock::m_rwlock protecting this subgraph, since some other thread had wr-lock on it. When this wr-lock was released it could have happened (if there was other pending wr-lock against this rwlock) that rd-lock from the first connection was left unsatisfied but at the same time new rd-lock request from the second connection sneaked in and was satisfied (for this to be possible second rd- request should come exactly after wr-lock is released but before pending wr-lock manages to grab rwlock, which is possible both on Linux and in our own rwlock implementation). If this second connection continued traversing wait-for graph and encountered sub-graph representing wait for flush it tried to acquire LOCK_open and thus deadlock was created. The previous patch tried to workaround this problem by not allowing deadlock detector to lock LOCK_open mutex if some other thread doing deadlock detection already owns it and current search depth is greater than 0. Instead deadlock was reported. As result it has introduced bug #56715. This patch solves this problem in a different way. It introduces a new rw_pr_lock_t implementation to be used by MDL subsystem instead of one based on Linux rwlocks or our own rwlock implementation. This new implementation never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock. Thus situation which has caused this bug becomes impossible with it. Due to fact that this implementation is optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests. Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. No test case is provided as this bug is very hard to repeat in MTR environment but is repeatable with the help of RQG tests. This patch also doesn't include test for bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors" as it takes too much time to be run as part of normal test-suite runs. QQ: Should we also remove support for preferring readers from my_rw_lock_t implementation? @ config.h.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.in We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ include/my_pthread.h Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. As part of this change removed try-lock part of API for this type of lock. It is not used in our code and it would be hard to implement correctly within constraints of new implementation. @ include/mysql/psi/mysql_thread.h Removed try-lock part of prlock API. It is not used in our code and it would be hard to implement correctly within constraints of new prlock implementation. @ mysys/thr_rwlock.c Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used.
[27 Sep 2010 9:48]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/119154 3142 Dmitry Lenev 2010-09-27 A better fix for bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector", which doesn't introduce bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors". Deadlock could have occurred when workload containing mix of DML, DDL and FLUSH TABLES statements affecting same set of tables was executed in heavily concurrent environment. This deadlock occurred when several connections tried to perform deadlock detection in metadata locking subsystem. The first connection started traversing wait-for graph, encountered sub-graph representing wait for flush, acquired LOCK_open and dived into sub-graph inspection. When it has encountered sub-graph corresponding to wait for metadata lock and blocked while trying to acquire rd-lock on MDL_lock::m_rwlock protecting this subgraph, since some other thread had wr-lock on it. When this wr-lock was released it could have happened (if there was other pending wr-lock against this rwlock) that rd-lock from the first connection was left unsatisfied but at the same time new rd-lock request from the second connection sneaked in and was satisfied (for this to be possible second rd- request should come exactly after wr-lock is released but before pending wr-lock manages to grab rwlock, which is possible both on Linux and in our own rwlock implementation). If this second connection continued traversing wait-for graph and encountered sub-graph representing wait for flush it tried to acquire LOCK_open and thus deadlock was created. The previous patch tried to workaround this problem by not allowing deadlock detector to lock LOCK_open mutex if some other thread doing deadlock detection already owns it and current search depth is greater than 0. Instead deadlock was reported. As result it has introduced bug #56715. This patch solves this problem in a different way. It introduces a new rw_pr_lock_t implementation to be used by MDL subsystem instead of one based on Linux rwlocks or our own rwlock implementation. This new implementation never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock. Thus situation which has caused this bug becomes impossible with it. Due to fact that this implementation is optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests. Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. No test case is provided as this bug is very hard to repeat in MTR environment but is repeatable with the help of RQG tests. This patch also doesn't include test for bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors" as it takes too much time to be run as part of normal test-suite runs. @ config.h.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.in We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ include/my_pthread.h Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. As part of this change removed try-lock part of API for this type of lock. It is not used in our code and it would be hard to implement correctly within constraints of new implementation. Finally, removed support of preferring readers from my_rw_lock_t implementation as the only user of this feature was old rw_pr_lock_t implementation. @ include/mysql/psi/mysql_thread.h Removed try-lock part of prlock API. It is not used in our code and it would be hard to implement correctly within constraints of new prlock implementation. @ mysys/thr_rwlock.c Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. Also removed support of preferring readers from my_rw_lock_t implementation as the only user of this feature was old rw_pr_lock_t implementation.
[29 Sep 2010 12:12]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/119406 3148 Dmitry Lenev 2010-09-29 A better fix for bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector" that doesn't introduce bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors". Deadlock could have occurred when workload containing a mix of DML, DDL and FLUSH TABLES statements affecting the same set of tables was executed in a heavily concurrent environment. This deadlock occurred when several connections tried to perform deadlock detection in the metadata locking subsystem. The first connection started traversing wait-for graph, encountered a sub-graph representing a wait for flush, acquired LOCK_open and dived into sub-graph inspection. Then it encountered sub-graph corresponding to wait for metadata lock and blocked while trying to acquire a rd-lock on MDL_lock::m_rwlock, since some,other thread had a wr-lock on it. When this wr-lock was released it could have happened (if there was another pending wr-lock against this rwlock) that the rd-lock from the first connection was left unsatisfied but at the same time the new rd-lock request from the second connection sneaked in and was satisfied (for this to be possible the second rd-request should come exactly after the wr-lock is released but before pending the wr-lock manages to grab rwlock, which is possible both on Linux and in our own rwlock implementation). If this second connection continued traversing the wait-for graph and encountered a sub-graph representing a wait for flush it tried to acquire LOCK_open and thus the deadlock was created. The previous patch tried to workaround this problem by not allowing the deadlock detector to lock LOCK_open mutex if some other thread doing deadlock detection already owns it and current search depth is greater than 0. Instead deadlock was reported. As a result it has introduced bug #56715. This patch solves this problem in a different way. It introduces a new rw_pr_lock_t implementation to be used by MDL subsystem instead of one based on Linux rwlocks or our own rwlock implementation. This new implementation never allows situation in which an rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock. Thus the situation which has caused this bug becomes impossible with this implementation. Due to fact that this implementation is optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in the MDL subsystem it doesn't introduce noticeable performance regressions in sysbench tests. Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. No test case is provided as this bug is very hard to repeat in MTR environment but is repeatable with the help of RQG tests. This patch also doesn't include a test for bug #56715 "Concurrent transactions + FLUSH result in sporadical unwarranted deadlock errors" as it takes too much time to be run as part of normal test-suite runs. @ config.h.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.cmake We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ configure.in We no longer need to check for presence of pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np as we no longer use Linux-specific implementation of rw_pr_lock_t which uses this function. @ include/my_pthread.h Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. As part of this change removed try-lock part of API for this type of lock. It is not used in our code and it would be hard to implement correctly within constraints of new implementation. Finally, removed support of preferring readers from my_rw_lock_t implementation as the only user of this feature was old rw_pr_lock_t implementation. @ include/mysql/psi/mysql_thread.h Removed try-lock part of prlock API. It is not used in our code and it would be hard to implement correctly within constraints of new prlock implementation. @ mysys/thr_rwlock.c Introduced new implementation of rw_pr_lock_t. Since it never allows situation in which rwlock is rd-locked and there is a blocked pending rd-lock it is not affected by bug #56405 "Deadlock in the MDL deadlock detector". This implementation is also optimized for wr-lock/unlock scenario which is most common in MDL subsystem. So it doesn't introduce noticiable performance regressions in sysbench tests (compared to old Linux-specific implementation). Moreover it significantly improves situation for POINT_SELECT test when many connections are used. Also removed support of preferring readers from my_rw_lock_t implementation as the only user of this feature was old rw_pr_lock_t implementation.
[29 Sep 2010 12:16]
Dmitry Lenev
Fix for this bug was queued into mysql-5.5-runtime tree.
[9 Nov 2010 19:48]
Bugs System
Pushed into mysql-5.5 5.5.7-rc (revid:sunanda.menon@sun.com-20101109182959-otkxq8vo2dcd13la) (version source revid:marko.makela@oracle.com-20100824081003-v4ecy0tga99cpxw2) (merge vers: 5.1.50) (pib:21)
[12 Nov 2010 0:34]
Paul DuBois
Noted in 5.5.7 changelog. Deadlock could occur for a workload consisting of a mix of DML, DDL, and FLUSH TABLES statements affecting the same set of tables in a heavily concurrent environment.
[13 Nov 2010 16:08]
Bugs System
Pushed into mysql-trunk 5.6.99-m5 (revid:alexander.nozdrin@oracle.com-20101113155825-czmva9kg4n31anmu) (version source revid:marko.makela@oracle.com-20100824081003-v4ecy0tga99cpxw2) (merge vers: 5.1.50) (pib:21)
[13 Nov 2010 16:39]
Bugs System
Pushed into mysql-next-mr (revid:alexander.nozdrin@oracle.com-20101113160336-atmtmfb3mzm4pz4i) (version source revid:marko.makela@oracle.com-20100824081003-v4ecy0tga99cpxw2) (pib:21)