Bug #27087 Unoptimal handling of failed API in SUMA

Submitted: 13 Mar 2007 14:34 Modified: 27 Mar 2007 14:33
Reporter: Jonas Oreland Email Updates:
Status: Closed Impact on me:
None 
Category:MySQL Cluster: Cluster (NDB) storage engine Severity:S3 (Non-critical)
Version:5.0-wl2325-5.0, 5.1* OS:
Assigned to: Jonas Oreland CPU Architecture:Any

[13 Mar 2007 14:34] Jonas Oreland
Description:
The same API_FAILREQ could(will) be sent several times to SUMA
SUMA does not currently check if it already has handled the signal,
which increases load of entire system...
 

How to repeat:
.

Suggested fix:
.
[13 Mar 2007 14:35] Jonas Oreland
Fix

Attachment: pp0.patch (text/x-patch), 1.08 KiB.

[14 Mar 2007 10:22] Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may
be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next
version. You can access the patch from:

  http://lists.mysql.com/commits/21864

ChangeSet@1.2433, 2007-03-14 11:22:11+01:00, jonas@perch.ndb.mysql.com +1 -0
  ndb - bug#27087
    Make sure not to handle API_FAILREQ if it's already handled
[14 Mar 2007 17:54] Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may
be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next
version. You can access the patch from:

  http://lists.mysql.com/commits/21923

ChangeSet@1.2118, 2007-03-14 14:53:53+01:00, jonas@perch.ndb.mysql.com +1 -0
  ndb - bug#27087 (wl2325-5.0)
    Make not to handle same API_FAILREQ several times
[20 Mar 2007 15:54] Jonas Oreland
pushed to wl2325-5.0, 5.1-ndb telco-6.1, 51-telco
[23 Mar 2007 7:59] Jon Stephens
Documented fix in 5.1.17 and telco-6.1.6 changelogs. Set back to Patch Pending for 5.0 version.
[27 Mar 2007 14:33] Jonas Oreland
it's a wont fix in 5.0
and drop5 is already documented.

closing this ?

Portions of this website are copyright © 2001, 2002 The PHP Group

Page generated in 0.059 sec. using MySQL 8.4.7-u6-cloud

Timestamp references displayed by the system are UTC.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.