Bug #93395 | ALTER USER succeeds on master but fails on slave. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 29 Nov 2018 6:50 | Modified: | 30 Jul 2019 7:34 |
Reporter: | Jean-François Gagné | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Duplicate | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Replication | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | 5.7.24 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[29 Nov 2018 6:50]
Jean-François Gagné
[29 Nov 2018 12:40]
MySQL Verification Team
Hello Jean-François, Thank you for the report and test case. Verified as described. regards, Umesh
[29 Nov 2018 12:46]
MySQL Verification Team
test results
Attachment: 93395_5.7.24.results (application/octet-stream, text), 8.90 KiB.
[23 Jul 2019 7:10]
Jean-François Gagné
I have not tested, but this looked fixed in 5.7.27. From https://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/5.7/en/news-5-7-27.html I can read: CREATE USER and ALTER USER did not check the validity of a hashed authentication string when used with IDENTIFIED WITH auth_plugin AS 'hash_string' syntax. (Bug #29395944) This is the 2nd attribution omission I am finding in 5.7.27 release notes (the other one was on Bug#95484). Is this a new policy not to update public bugs with fixed version and not to mention the public bugs in the release notes ?
[29 Jul 2019 6:35]
Erlend Dahl
Duplicate of Bug#94440 some function problem while create an user There is no change in the bug handling process.
[29 Jul 2019 7:39]
Jean-François Gagné
Erlend, how can this be a duplicate of a bug created more than 2 months after this one ? This bug number is 93395, the "duplicate of" is #94440, shouldn't Bug#94440 be marked as a duplicate of this one ? I understand that some "better report" that are done later can trigger an older bug to be marked as duplicate, but what is wrong in my report ? Steps to reproduce were there, and Umesh was able to replicate and verify the bug. I think this deserves a better explanation, thanks in advance for it.
[29 Jul 2019 12:18]
MySQL Verification Team
Jean-Francois, The explanation is simple. The other bug was fixed before this one, because it turned out that category is wrong.
[30 Jul 2019 7:34]
Jean-François Gagné
The reason I was given for this bug being flagged as a duplicate of a newer bug is the following ([1]): > Simply because the work was done on the newer bug, presumably because the dev wasn't aware of the older one. Hence the more recent bug was recorded in changelogs etc. Given that, it makes more sense to record 93395 as a duplicate of the newer bug. [1]: https://mysqlcommunity.slack.com/archives/C8R1336M7/p1564386444100200?thread_ts=1563865915...