Bug #91829 Class Gtid_state has a wrong function to_string(char *buf)
Submitted: 30 Jul 2018 9:51 Modified: 30 Jul 2018 12:52
Reporter: kfpanda kf Email Updates:
Status: Verified Impact on me:
None 
Category:MySQL Server: Replication Severity:S2 (Serious)
Version:5.7.22, 5.7.23, 8.0.12 OS:Any
Assigned to: CPU Architecture:Any

[30 Jul 2018 9:51] kfpanda kf
Description:
I found an obvious mistake when I read the MySQL code.
 
Second lost_gtids.to_string(p) should be replaced with gtids_only_in_table.to_string(p).

---------------------CODE: MySQL 5.7.22 
rpl_gtid.h:

  /// Debug only: Generate a string in the given buffer and return the length.
  int to_string(char *buf) const
  {
    char *p= buf;
    p+= sprintf(p, "Executed GTIDs:\n");
    p+= executed_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nOwned GTIDs:\n");
    p+= owned_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nLost GTIDs:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nGTIDs only_in_table:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    return (int)(p - buf);
  }

-----------------------CODE: Fixed

rpl_gtid.h:

  /// Debug only: Generate a string in the given buffer and return the length.
  int to_string(char *buf) const
  {
    char *p= buf;
    p+= sprintf(p, "Executed GTIDs:\n");
    p+= executed_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nOwned GTIDs:\n");
    p+= owned_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nLost GTIDs:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nGTIDs only_in_table:\n");
    p+= gtids_only_in_table.to_string(p);
    return (int)(p - buf);
  }

How to repeat:
I found an obvious mistake when I read the MySQL code.
 
Second lost_gtids.to_string(p) should be replaced with gtids_only_in_table.to_string(p).

---------------------CODE: MySQL 5.7.22 
rpl_gtid.h:

  /// Debug only: Generate a string in the given buffer and return the length.
  int to_string(char *buf) const
  {
    char *p= buf;
    p+= sprintf(p, "Executed GTIDs:\n");
    p+= executed_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nOwned GTIDs:\n");
    p+= owned_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nLost GTIDs:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nGTIDs only_in_table:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    return (int)(p - buf);
  }

-----------------------CODE: Fixed

rpl_gtid.h:

  /// Debug only: Generate a string in the given buffer and return the length.
  int to_string(char *buf) const
  {
    char *p= buf;
    p+= sprintf(p, "Executed GTIDs:\n");
    p+= executed_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nOwned GTIDs:\n");
    p+= owned_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nLost GTIDs:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nGTIDs only_in_table:\n");
    p+= gtids_only_in_table.to_string(p);
    return (int)(p - buf);
  }

Suggested fix:
I found an obvious mistake when I read the MySQL code.
 
Second lost_gtids.to_string(p) should be replaced with gtids_only_in_table.to_string(p).

---------------------CODE: MySQL 5.7.22 
rpl_gtid.h:

  /// Debug only: Generate a string in the given buffer and return the length.
  int to_string(char *buf) const
  {
    char *p= buf;
    p+= sprintf(p, "Executed GTIDs:\n");
    p+= executed_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nOwned GTIDs:\n");
    p+= owned_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nLost GTIDs:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nGTIDs only_in_table:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    return (int)(p - buf);
  }

-----------------------CODE: Fixed

rpl_gtid.h:

  /// Debug only: Generate a string in the given buffer and return the length.
  int to_string(char *buf) const
  {
    char *p= buf;
    p+= sprintf(p, "Executed GTIDs:\n");
    p+= executed_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nOwned GTIDs:\n");
    p+= owned_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nLost GTIDs:\n");
    p+= lost_gtids.to_string(p);
    p+= sprintf(p, "\nGTIDs only_in_table:\n");
    p+= gtids_only_in_table.to_string(p);
    return (int)(p - buf);
  }
[30 Jul 2018 12:52] MySQL Verification Team
Hello kfpanda kf,

Thank you for the report and feedback!

Thanks,
Umesh