Bug #8834 | MySQL server dies with a signal 11 error | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 27 Feb 2005 20:44 | Modified: | 7 Jun 2005 14:18 |
Reporter: | Igal Rubinstein | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server | Severity: | S1 (Critical) |
Version: | 4.1.9 | OS: | Linux (RedHat Enterprise Linux 3) |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[27 Feb 2005 20:44]
Igal Rubinstein
[28 Feb 2005 2:03]
Jorge del Conde
Hi Would it be possible for you to provide us with a test case that reproduces this behaviour ? Thanks a lot
[28 Feb 2005 9:02]
Igal Rubinstein
Thank you for your answer. Actually, it seems to happen when the system receives many new connections in a very short period of time. My assumption is that the crash happens when the number of threads (and connections) climbs beyond 600-700. Igal.
[28 Feb 2005 9:05]
Igal Rubinstein
P.S As you can see from the above text there is no specific query that causes such behavior.
[28 Feb 2005 9:05]
Igal Rubinstein
P.S As you can see from the above text there is no specific query that causes such behavior.
[28 Mar 2005 23:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".
[29 Mar 2005 8:52]
Sergei Golubchik
reopened
[7 May 2005 14:15]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
Could you be possibly just suffering from the following known problem that is documented on http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/innodb-configuration.html ? Warning: On 32-bit GNU/Linux x86, you must be careful not to set memory usage too high. glibc may allow the process heap to grow over thread stacks, which crashes your server. It is a risk if the value of the following expression is close to or exceeds 2GB: [...]
[7 Jun 2005 23:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".