Bug #75530 | Unknown Error | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 16 Jan 2015 16:28 | Modified: | 4 Mar 2015 7:49 |
Reporter: | Joel Hanger | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Cluster: Cluster (NDB) storage engine | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | 5.6.17-ndb-7.3.5 | OS: | Linux (CentOS release 6.5 (Final)) |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
Tags: | 2341, cluster shutdown, failed, halt, internal, ndbrequire, programming, Temporary error, unkown |
[16 Jan 2015 16:28]
Joel Hanger
[16 Jan 2015 23:27]
Joel Hanger
After bringing the cluster up, 2 nodes ( from separate node groups ) lagged in starting up until the cluster was online. Nodes 8 & 9 were the lagging in this: [ndbd(NDB)] 8 node(s) id=3 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 0, *) id=4 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 0) id=5 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 1) id=6 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 1) id=7 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 2) id=8 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 2) id=9 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 3) id=10 @10.1.5.XXX (mysql-5.6.17 ndb-7.3.5, Nodegroup: 3) Node 7: Data usage is 59%(401062 32K pages of total 671328) Node 8: Data usage is 66%(444062 32K pages of total 671328) Node 9: Data usage is 68%(459314 32K pages of total 671328) Node 10: Data usage is 60%(403285 32K pages of total 671328) All the other node groups have the exact same usage however.. ie: Node 3: Data usage is 58%(393240 32K pages of total 671328) Node 4: Data usage is 58%(393240 32K pages of total 671328)
[4 Feb 2015 7:49]
MySQL Verification Team
Thank you for the report. I could not reproduce this issue at my end(tried with 7.3.7/8). Could you please provide a repeatable test case to trigger this issue at our end? Also, see Bug #70217 Thanks, Umesh
[5 Mar 2015 1:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".