Bug #69273 | SQL Server 2008 R2 DTS sends data to MySQL 5.5 "MySQL Server Gone Away" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 17 May 2013 21:31 | Modified: | 20 Jun 2013 13:38 |
Reporter: | Marco Hernandez | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: DML | Severity: | S1 (Critical) |
Version: | 5.5.28-29.3-log | OS: | Linux (by sitegrounds.com) |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
Tags: | dts, gone away, sql server |
[17 May 2013 21:31]
Marco Hernandez
[20 May 2013 12:04]
MySQL Verification Team
Thank you for the bug report. If 1 of 3 DTS has this issue Why do you think is a server bug?. Please check http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/gone-away.html . Thanks.
[20 May 2013 13:00]
Marco Hernandez
I don't think it is a bug per-se, I just don't know how to fix it! If the Server "Goes away" because we bombard it with INSERT statements (which is essentially what a DTS does) that impacts the performance, then HOW tell me, HOW can we optimize this? What can we do to make sure that the data does cross the cable into our database? and seriously of all SQL statements, HOW idoes an INSERT make it into the slow query log? (ours do!) Remember this is a DTS that runs once every day, sends anything from 1000 to 5000 rows each day, and that data has to cross, we even use MyISAM to compensate for performance, but if the server "Goes Away" we have to wait for the next day to sincronize and next day there will be more data, and therefore, it will be more likely that it will "go away", so assuming this is a bandwidth or concurrency problem HOW do we make it not "go away"? and seriously WHY does it go away? can't it just "stay there" and become a bit slower?
[20 May 2013 13:38]
MySQL Verification Team
Thank you for the feedback. Did you read the Manual and tested the wait_timeout changes?. Also notice here isn't a forum to discuss the use of the product instead is to report bugs repeatable with test cases provide by preference. Thanks.
[21 Jun 2013 1:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".