Bug #69102 | Add counter for number of "statements" skipped due to SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 30 Apr 2013 10:52 | Modified: | 30 Apr 2013 17:45 |
Reporter: | Simon Mudd (OCA) | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Verified | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Replication | Severity: | S4 (Feature request) |
Version: | 5.6.11 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[30 Apr 2013 10:52]
Simon Mudd
[30 Apr 2013 13:22]
MySQL Verification Team
It appears in the slave's error log, but that is not queryable via SQL: 2013-04-30 15:20:15 3984 [Note] 'SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER=2' executed at relay_log_file='.\test-relay-bin.000004', relay_log_pos='282', master_log_name='test-bin.000001', master_log_pos='120' and new position at relay_log_file='.\test-relay-bin.000005', relay_log_pos='532', master_log_name='test-bin.000001', master_log_pos='370'
[30 Apr 2013 17:45]
Simon Mudd
The reason for wanting to have these counters is: - you might need to skip certain types of error - you might have that configured and want to know if you are still getting errors or things may have recovered (parsing the log files each time is not helpful) - for graphing this gives you a way of tracking issues over time (normally you would expect this counter to not change) - if you have a large replication tree it may be better to have some broken tables rather than a slave which is not up to date at all (thus affecting more parts of the database) so while stopping and looking at each error in turn and dealing with it by hand that may not be practical as the number of servers you manage grows: initially you just skip (some) errors and then can monitor whether the problem is resolved, finally resolving the issue in a more co-ordinated fashion. These counters make monitoring such issues much easier.