Bug #66891 | how to create queries log for prepared statement in mysql | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 20 Sep 2012 13:56 | Modified: | 20 Oct 2012 20:10 |
Reporter: | Devashish Chourey | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Tracing | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 1 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
Tags: | how to create log queries for prepared statement in mysql. |
[20 Sep 2012 13:56]
Devashish Chourey
[20 Sep 2012 20:10]
Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the report. I either can not repeat described behavior or don't get what you mean. Here is my slow query log content. Version 5.5: /home/sveta/src/mysql-5.5/sql/mysqld, Version: 5.5.29-debug-log (Source distribution). started with: Tcp port: 13000 Unix socket: /home/sveta/src/mysql-5.5/mysql-test/var/tmp/mysqld.1.sock Time Id Command Argument # Time: 120920 23:09:28 # User@Host: root[root] @ localhost [] # Query_time: 10.000216 Lock_time: 0.000000 Rows_sent: 1 Rows_examined: 0 use test; SET timestamp=1348171768; select sleep(10); # Time: 120920 23:09:33 # User@Host: root[root] @ localhost [] # Query_time: 5.000210 Lock_time: 0.000000 Rows_sent: 1 Rows_examined: 0 SET timestamp=1348171773; select sleep(5); Version 5.1: /home/sveta/src/mysql-5.1/sql/mysqld, Version: 5.1.67-debug-log (Source distribution). started with: Tcp port: 13000 Unix socket: /home/sveta/src/mysql-5.1/mysql-test/var/tmp/mysqld.1.sock Time Id Command Argument # Time: 120920 23:10:17 # User@Host: root[root] @ localhost [] # Query_time: 10.000517 Lock_time: 0.000000 Rows_sent: 1 Rows_examined: 0 use test; SET timestamp=1348171817; select sleep(10); # Time: 120920 23:10:22 # User@Host: root[root] @ localhost [] # Query_time: 5.000447 Lock_time: 0.000000 Rows_sent: 1 Rows_examined: 0 SET timestamp=1348171822; select sleep(5); I prepared and executed this: prepare p2 from 'select sleep(?)'; set @a=10; execute p2 using @a; set @a=5; execute p2 using @a; Please explain what is wrong here.
[21 Oct 2012 1:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".