Bug #66490 | socket file already exists, mysqld already running | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 22 Aug 2012 6:39 | Modified: | 24 Jun 2014 7:40 |
Reporter: | yang ww | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Not a Bug | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Cluster Manager: Agent | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 1.1.6, 1.3.1 | OS: | Linux |
Assigned to: | Thomas Nielsen | CPU Architecture: | Any |
Tags: | cluster, mcm |
[22 Aug 2012 6:39]
yang ww
[21 Jun 2014 7:28]
MySQL Verification Team
Thank you for the report. I'm able to reproduce this issue after manually restarting one of the mysqld when the agent/cluster was completely down. Later attempt to start the cluster resulted in reported error. Workaround - Kill the mysqld and restart again.
[21 Jun 2014 7:29]
MySQL Verification Team
// mcm>start cluster mycluster; ERROR 7006 (00MGR): Process error: socket file /tmp/mysql.mycluster.51.sock already exists for process mysqld 5 on cluster-repo. Is a mysqld already running? mcm> mcm>start cluster mycluster; ERROR 7006 (00MGR): Process error: socket file /tmp/mysql.mycluster.51.sock already exists for process mysqld 5 on cluster-repo. Is a mysqld already running? mcm>show status -r mycluster; +--------+----------+--------------+---------+-----------+-----------+ | NodeId | Process | Host | Status | Nodegroup | Package | +--------+----------+--------------+---------+-----------+-----------+ | 49 | ndb_mgmd | cluster-repo | stopped | | mypackage | | 1 | ndbd | cluster-repo | stopped | 0 | mypackage | | 2 | ndbd | cluster-repo | stopped | 0 | mypackage | | 50 | mysqld | cluster-repo | stopped | | mypackage | | 51 | mysqld | cluster-repo | stopped | | mypackage | | 52 | ndbapi | * | added | | | +--------+----------+--------------+---------+-----------+-----------+ 6 rows in set (0.09 sec) mcm>stop process 51 mycluster; +------------------------------+ | Command result | +------------------------------+ | Process stopped successfully | +------------------------------+ 1 row in set (2.28 sec) mcm>show status -r mycluster; +--------+----------+--------------+---------+-----------+-----------+ | NodeId | Process | Host | Status | Nodegroup | Package | +--------+----------+--------------+---------+-----------+-----------+ | 49 | ndb_mgmd | cluster-repo | stopped | | mypackage | | 1 | ndbd | cluster-repo | stopped | 0 | mypackage | | 2 | ndbd | cluster-repo | stopped | 0 | mypackage | | 50 | mysqld | cluster-repo | stopped | | mypackage | | 51 | mysqld | cluster-repo | stopped | | mypackage | | 52 | ndbapi | * | added | | | +--------+----------+--------------+---------+-----------+-----------+ 6 rows in set (0.06 sec) mcm>start cluster mycluster; ERROR 7006 (00MGR): Process error: socket file /tmp/mysql.mycluster.51.sock already exists for process mysqld 5 on cluster-repo. Is a mysqld already running? mcm>
[24 Jun 2014 7:40]
Thomas Nielsen
The reason MCM rejects the start in this case is MCM has no way of knowing whether the existing socket belongs to another running mysqld instance, if its a leftover file from a previously running mysqld, or simply any existing ordinary file with an identical name. For this very reason, MCM cannot simply remove the offending file, and continue starting the mysqld. The error seen is hence "by design". The errormessage has also been vastly improved since MCM 1.1.6, and now also list the filename of the offending socket: mcm>start cluster mycluster; ERROR 7006 (00MGR): Process error: socket file /tmp/mysql.mycluster.51.sock already exists for process mysqld 5 on hostA. Is a mysqld already running? It's possible to find the socket value using the "get" command: mcm>get socket:mysqld mycluster; +--------+------------------------------+----------+---------+----------+----- ----+-------+---------+ | Name | Value | Process1 | NodeId1 | Process2 | NodeId2 | Level | Comment | +--------+------------------------------+----------+---------+----------+----- ----+-------+---------+ | socket | /tmp/mysql.mycluster.50.sock | mysqld | 50 | | | | | | socket | /tmp/mysql.mycluster.51.sock | mysqld | 51 | | | | | +--------+------------------------------+----------+---------+----------+----- ----+-------+---------+ 2 rows in set (0.10 sec) Closing as not a bug.