Bug #65990 | Deadlock in JDBC driver | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 23 Jul 2012 22:24 | Modified: | 14 Oct 2012 18:37 |
Reporter: | Bill Evans | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | Connector / J | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | 5.1.20 | OS: | Solaris |
Assigned to: | Assigned Account | CPU Architecture: | Any |
Tags: | deadlock jdbc |
[23 Jul 2012 22:24]
Bill Evans
[24 Jul 2012 7:48]
Tonci Grgin
Bill, you might wish to try Mark's suggestions from BUG#64700. Please inform us of result.
[24 Jul 2012 7:49]
Tonci Grgin
Also, please do try latest version (5.1.21).
[24 Jul 2012 14:20]
Bill Evans
Tonci, After reading BUG#64700, I don't see what aspect of that bug helps me. You can see from my stack trace that I don't use c3p0. Besides that it is not a simple matter to reproduce my issue. For the same reason, trying 5.1.21 is not realistic. Also, since both BUG#64700 & BUG#64954 are still open it would seem unlikely that the problem is fixed. The most important question I would like you to answer is: Can this issue happen in version 5.1.13? Can you tell, by changes that were made, when the problem was introduced? Thanks. Bill
[24 Jul 2012 15:47]
Mark Matthews
Bill, "useDynamicCharsetInfo=false" should fix your issue if I'm reading your thread dump correctly. The other bugs you reference aren't the same deadlock, a few may have been fixed with a change in the driver's locking model for 5.1.21, and all of them are either known issues with the JDBC specification requirements itself (addressed in later revisions), or anti-patterns used by some connection pools.
[14 Sep 2012 18:37]
Sveta Smirnova
Bill, please try Mark's suggestion and inform us about result.
[15 Oct 2012 1:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".