Bug #6255 | DROP DATABASE bug on Mac OS X | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 25 Oct 2004 20:51 | Modified: | 2 Dec 2004 7:25 |
Reporter: | Adriaan van Os | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server | Severity: | S1 (Critical) |
Version: | 4.1.5-gamma | OS: | MacOS (Mac OS X 10.2.8) |
Assigned to: | Assigned Account | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[25 Oct 2004 20:51]
Adriaan van Os
[27 Oct 2004 10:36]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
I haven't been able to reproduce this. Can you please add a working script that can be used to reproduce the problem?
[2 Nov 2004 0:58]
Matthew Lord
Hi, Thanks for your bug report! I haven't been able to repeat this problem. Do you have a way which you can repeat this problem every time? This is the type of thing I was doing with the query cache enabled: mysql> create table mytest( id int not null ); Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> insert into mytest values (1), (2), (3), (4), (5); Query OK, 5 rows affected (0.00 sec) Records: 5 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql> select * from mytest; +----+ | id | +----+ | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | | 4 | | 5 | +----+ 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> drop table mytest; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> create table mytest( id int not null ); Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec) mysql> select * from mytest; Empty set (0.00 sec) I believe that's the type of thing you're describing. I was doing this with 4.1.7 on 10.2.8. Best Regards
[2 Nov 2004 7:25]
Adriaan van Os
Thanks for your comment and for looking into this. I wanted to write a small testprogram to reproduce this, but at the moment I don't have the time to do so (next month I have more time than now). I used libmysqlclient_r.a rather than the command line interface (if that makes any difference. I see that in your test you used DROP TABLE rather than DROP DATABASE (without a DROP TABLE). Regards, Adriaan van Os
[14 Feb 2005 22:54]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".