Bug #60311 | SQL Reformatter voids unions when there are subqueries | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 3 Mar 2011 8:59 | Modified: | 7 Feb 2012 22:21 |
Reporter: | Mikiya Okuno | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Workbench: SQL Editor | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.2.31 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[3 Mar 2011 8:59]
Mikiya Okuno
[7 Mar 2011 0:46]
MySQL Verification Team
Now I can see that SQL reformatter doesn't break SQL syntax on 5.2.32. However, its layout is still terrible. The query "select a from x union select b from y where a in (select c from z)" causes the following output: select `a` from `x`union select `b` from `y` where `a` in (select `c` from `z`) The query "select a from x where a in (select b from y) union select c from z" causes the following output: select `a` from `x` where `a` in (select `b` from `y`)union select `c` from `z` This isn't easy to read.
[5 Apr 2011 21:45]
Alfredo Kojima
Does something like below code look ok? Assuming real SQL would be longer than below. Any suggestions, if not? select `a` from `x` where `a` in (select `b` from `y`) union select `c` from `z`
[8 Jun 2011 1:57]
MySQL Verification Team
Looks very nice :)
[7 Feb 2012 22:21]
Philip Olson
Fixed as of 5.2.38: "Plugins", "Utilities", "Reformat SQL Query" would mangle queries by removing the first "SELECT" statement if a subquery clause was present