Bug #5687 InnoDB doesn't check row limit size on CREATE
Submitted: 21 Sep 2004 20:53 Modified: 21 Sep 2004 20:58
Reporter: Hartmut Holzgraefe Email Updates:
Status: Duplicate Impact on me:
None 
Category:MySQL Server: InnoDB storage engine Severity:S3 (Non-critical)
Version: OS:
Assigned to: CPU Architecture:Any

[21 Sep 2004 20:53] Hartmut Holzgraefe
Description:
InnoDB limits row sizes to 8k but doesn't check whether a table 
exceeds it at creation time.

How to repeat:
CREATE TABLE a (
    -> f1 char(255) default '-',
    -> f2 char(255) default '-',
    -> f3 char(255) default '-',
    -> f4 char(255) default '-',
    -> f5 char(255) default '-',
    -> f6 char(255) default '-',
    -> f7 char(255) default '-',
    -> f8 char(255) default '-',
    -> f9 char(255) default '-',
    -> f10 char(255) default '-',
    -> f11 char(255) default '-',
    -> f12 char(255) default '-',
    -> f13 char(255) default '-',
    -> f14 char(255) default '-',
    -> f15 char(255) default '-',
    -> f16 char(255) default '-',
    -> f17 char(255) default '-',
    -> f18 char(255) default '-',
    -> f19 char(255) default '-',
    -> f20 char(255) default '-',
    -> f21 char(255) default '-',
    -> f22 char(255) default '-',
    -> f23 char(255) default '-',
    -> f24 char(255) default '-',
    -> f25 char(255) default '-',
    -> f26 char(255) default '-',
    -> f27 char(255) default '-',
    -> f28 char(255) default '-',
    -> f29 char(255) default '-',
    -> f30 char(255) default '-',
    -> f31 char(255) default '-',
    -> f32 char(255) default '-',
    -> f33 char(255) default '-',
    -> f34 char(255) default '-',
    -> f35 char(255) default '-',
    -> f36 char(255) default '-'
    -> ) type=InnoDB;
/* no warning although the row size exceeds the 8k limit */

INSERT INTO a SET f1='x';
/* this returns 'ERROR 1030 (00000): Got error 139 from table handler' */

Suggested fix:
make CREATE TABLE check the limit
[21 Sep 2004 20:58] Marko Mäkelä
Please do not submit the same bug more than once. An existing
bug report already describes this very problem. Even if you feel
that your issue is somewhat different, the resolution is likely
to be the same. Because of this, we hope you add your comments
to the original bug instead.

Thank you for your interest in MySQL.

Additional info:

See bug #5682