Bug #44010 | Different result from information_schema.is_routines between 5.1 and 6.0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 1 Apr 2009 8:50 | Modified: | 1 Apr 2009 9:27 |
Reporter: | Magnus Blåudd | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Not a Bug | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Information schema | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.1, 6.0 bzr | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[1 Apr 2009 8:50]
Magnus Blåudd
[1 Apr 2009 9:00]
Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the report. Verified as described.
[1 Apr 2009 9:04]
Sveta Smirnova
Reading result in 6.0: SELECT specific_name,routine_catalog,routine_schema,routine_name,routine_type, routine_body,external_name,external_language,parameter_style,sql_path FROM information_schema.routines WHERE routine_catalog IS NOT NULL OR external_name IS NOT NULL OR external_language IS NOT NULL OR sql_path IS NOT NULL OR routine_body <> 'SQL' OR parameter_style <> 'SQL' OR specific_name <> routine_name ; specific_name add_suppression routine_catalog def routine_schema mtr routine_name add_suppression routine_type PROCEDURE routine_body SQL external_name NULL external_language NULL parameter_style SQL sql_path NULL While in 5.1: specific_name add_suppression routine_catalog NULL routine_schema mtr routine_name add_suppression routine_type PROCEDURE routine_body SQL external_name NULL external_language NULL parameter_style SQL sql_path NULL So only difference is routine_catalog is 'def' in 6.0 while it is NULL in 5.1. So what is the bug about? Should we implement routine_catalog in 5.1 or?
[1 Apr 2009 9:27]
Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the feedback. Currently documentation contains information about it: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/6.0/en/routines-table.html INFORMATION_SCHEMA Name mysql.proc Name Remarks ROUTINE_CATALOG def and INFORMATION_SCHEMA Name mysql.proc Name Remarks ROUTINE_CATALOG NULL So I close the report as "Not a Bug", because behavior is documented.