Bug #42105 | EXPLAIN/example query is not always shown for queries with > 500ms runtimes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 14 Jan 2009 10:25 | Modified: | 26 Apr 2011 19:39 |
Reporter: | Mark Leith | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Enterprise Monitor: Agent | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 2.0.1.7125 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | Jan Kneschke | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[14 Jan 2009 10:25]
Mark Leith
[14 Jan 2009 15:00]
Mark Leith
This also happens with the example query text too.
[6 Mar 2009 19:55]
Mark Leith
Bug #43212 was marked as a duplicate of this one.
[30 Jun 2009 12:15]
Enterprise Tools JIRA Robot
Jan Kneschke writes: it is really accepted.
[30 Sep 2009 19:24]
Enterprise Tools JIRA Robot
Mark Matthews writes: There is a possibility to fix this without JSON/REST but by letting the slot count for examples and explains be varied by the service manager, or when the agent notices that things will be "overrun"?
[6 Jan 2011 9:40]
Enterprise Tools JIRA Robot
Jan Kneschke writes: After investigating #40462 it showed we use the item-hash value-caching wrongly for the QUAN case. Under heavy query load this may result in loss of QUAN data before it could be sent up to the MEM-server. The agent log would contain plenty of lines like: {noformat} (histogram_collect) can't find norm_query_inst: 0e982db4-2577-4fc0-b4d2-d1721748bfbf..efbb23290963b1cdc83186b600162246 [quan.lua] norm_query_inst not found: 0e982db4-2577-4fc0-b4d2-d1721748bfbf..efbb23290963b1cdc83186b600162246 {noformat} Heavy query load means that it has to take more than 20sec to send up all the QUAN data to MEM-server.
[14 Jan 2011 18:18]
Enterprise Tools JIRA Robot
Jan Kneschke writes: Pushed to agent-trunk: revno: 2003 fixes bug(s): http://bugs.mysql.com/42105 committer: jan@mysql.com branch nick: trunk timestamp: Fri 2011-01-14 18:57:25 +0100 message: fetch all QUAN data from the Lua script over to the item-hash at list-instances(mysql::statementsummary) time (fixes #42104/EM-3001) * all QUAN classes are fetched at the same time * data is consistent * data removal is predictible
[16 Jan 2011 0:18]
Enterprise Tools JIRA Robot
Andy Bang writes: Fix is in build 2.3.2.2051.
[11 Apr 2011 16:09]
Mark Leith
This was resolved in 2.3.2