Bug #41738 | Foreign keys: failure if trigger | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 24 Dec 2008 20:53 | Modified: | 19 Jan 2009 19:11 |
Reporter: | Peter Gulutzan | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Not a Bug | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: General | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 6.1.0-alpha-debug | OS: | Linux (SUSE 10.0 / 32-bit) |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[24 Dec 2008 20:53]
Peter Gulutzan
[28 Dec 2008 16:00]
MySQL Verification Team
Thank you for the bug report. I am getting the below error in the update command so different select results than the test case, that doesn't happens on your side?. miguel@hegel:~/dbs$ 6.1/bin/mysql -uroot test Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 1 Server version: 6.1.0-alpha-debug Source distribution Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> drop table if exists t1; Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec) mysql> drop table if exists t2; Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.00 sec) mysql> create table t1 (s1 int default -1, s2 int default -1, primary key (s1,s2)) -> engine=falcon; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.73 sec) mysql> create table t2 (s1 int default -1, s2 int default -1, foreign key (s1,s2) references t1 -> (s1,s2) on update set default on delete set default) engine=falcon; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec) mysql> create trigger t1_bu before update on t1 for each row set new.s1 = 2; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec) mysql> create trigger t2_bu before update on t2 for each row set new.s1 = 3; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> insert into t1 values (1,1),(3,1); Query OK, 2 rows affected (0.00 sec) Records: 2 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql> insert into t2 values (1,1); Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec) mysql> update t1 set s1 = 0 where s1 = 1; ERROR 1780 (23000): Foreign key error: constraint 'fk_t2_mdq4r': no matching key for value '3--1', it is not in parent table
[4 Jan 2009 16:28]
Peter Gulutzan
I am now getting the same results as Miguel gets. That's still a bug, so I'll call this "verified". But it's still true that we don't expect this to be fixed until a later milestone.
[13 Jan 2009 17:50]
Dmitry Lenev
Hi Peter! Could you please clarify what results do you expect? IMO results which Miguel is getting are correct and expected ones... Do I miss something?
[14 Jan 2009 20:28]
Peter Gulutzan
The error message says "no matching key for value '3--1', it is not in parent table" but the parent table has a row (3,1).
[19 Jan 2009 19:11]
Dmitry Lenev
Indeed parent table has (3, 1) row. But the above error message complains about absence of row (3, -1) which is not there. So I think what the see above is expected and correct behavior. So I am closing this report as "Not a bug".