Bug #37602 mysql-proxy ***MEMORY-ERROR***
Submitted: 24 Jun 2008 8:19 Modified: 17 Oct 2009 19:33
Reporter: jabincn jabincn Email Updates:
Status: No Feedback Impact on me:
None 
Category:MySQL Proxy Severity:S3 (Non-critical)
Version:0.6, 0.6.1 OS:Linux
Assigned to: CPU Architecture:Any

[24 Jun 2008 8:19] jabincn jabincn
Description:
i think backup my table(mysqldump databasename tablename > tablename.sql),but mysql-proxy error and exit:

***MEMORY-ERROR***: mysql-proxy[6210]: GSlice: failed to allocate 248 bytes (alignment: 256): Cannot allocate memory

How to repeat:
***MEMORY-ERROR***: mysql-proxy[6210]: GSlice: failed to allocate 248 bytes (alignment: 256): Cannot allocate memory
[24 Jun 2008 13:40] Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the report.

I can not repeat described behavior.

Please indicate:

1. Accurate version of MySQL Proxy you using
2. How do you start MySQL Proxy
3. Accurate command you use to invoke mysqldump
4. If bug is repeatable only with particular table or with any. I.e. if bug is repeatable with example table: CREATE TABLE example(f1 INT);
[24 Jul 2008 23:00] Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is
being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the
information that was originally requested, please do so and change
the status of the bug back to "Open".
[16 Sep 2009 15:19] Foster Schucker
I get a similar error:
***MEMORY-ERROR***: mysql-proxy[9280]: GSlice: failed to allocate 248 bytes (alignment: 256): Cannot allocate memory

I get this when I do a query that has a large result set (> 1 million rows) 

Version 0.6.1
[17 Sep 2009 19:33] Sveta Smirnova
Foster,

thank you for the feedback.

I can not repeat described behavior with set of 2,000,000 rows. Although with version 0.6.1 I experienced some slowdown which is not the case in current version.

Please try current version 0.7.2 and if problem still exists provide output of SHOW CREATE TABLE problem_table and SHOW TABLE STATUS LIKE 'problem_table'
[17 Oct 2009 23:00] Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is
being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the
information that was originally requested, please do so and change
the status of the bug back to "Open".