Bug #33489 Falcon queries misinterpret max_join_size
| Submitted: | 23 Dec 2007 11:14 | Modified: | 26 May 2010 17:49 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reporter: | Philip Stoev | Email Updates: | |
| Status: | Unsupported | Impact on me: | |
| Category: | MySQL Server: Falcon storage engine | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
| Version: | 6.0.4/6.0BK | OS: | Any |
| Assigned to: | Lars-Erik Bjørk | CPU Architecture: | Any |
| Tags: | F_HANDLER | ||
[23 Dec 2007 11:14]
Philip Stoev
[23 Dec 2007 22:10]
MySQL Verification Team
Thank you for the bug report. c:\dbs>6.0t\bin\mysql -uroot db1 Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 3 Server version: 6.0.5-alpha-team-tree-nt Source distribution Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> create table t1 (f1 integer) engine=falcon; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.09 sec) mysql> set max_join_size=1000; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from t1; ERROR 1104 (42000): The SELECT would examine more than MAX_JOIN_SIZE rows; check your WHERE f the SELECT is okay mysql>
[29 Aug 2008 20:13]
Kevin Lewis
LarsErik, Please investigate this strange behavior. You may be able to get help or pointers from Sergey Petrunia, who is an optimizer expert.
[15 Jan 2009 14:56]
Lars-Erik Bjørk
Looking briefly at this bug, it looks like Falcon has a strange implementation of scan_time(). If I understand this correctly, this function should return the expected number of IOs necessary to read a given table, so that the optimizer can chose the correct access method. This number also seems to be used to check if we will exceed the max_join_size. Falcon calculates this as: number of records in table * 1000 which to me seems to be a tad high
Portions of this website are copyright © 2001, 2002 The PHP Group
Page generated in 0.054 sec. using MySQL 8.4.7-u6-cloud
Timestamp references displayed by the system are UTC.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the
respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance
by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of
Oracle or any other party.