Bug #32955 | Node repeatedly crashes with error 6050 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 4 Dec 2007 12:10 | Modified: | 13 Mar 2009 9:54 |
Reporter: | James Graham | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Can't repeat | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Cluster: Cluster (NDB) storage engine | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.0.45 | OS: | Linux (Debian etch) |
Assigned to: | Jonas Oreland | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[4 Dec 2007 12:10]
James Graham
[4 Dec 2007 12:19]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
To look into this any further we need to know: - CPU usage of the ndbd process when it runs into this - the cluster configuration file - the general cluster log and the error log and trace logs from this node - information on the amount of objects (tables, indexes, ...) and data in the cluster and whether TEXT or BLOB columns are used would help, too
[4 Dec 2007 12:36]
James Graham
ndbd hovers around 60% but can range from 40% - 80%. config.ini: [NDBD DEFAULT] NoOfReplicas=2 DataMemory=2048MB IndexMemory=512MB MaxNoOfAttributes=10000 MaxNoOfConcurrentOperations=131072 MaxNoOfOrderedIndexes=1024 MaxNoOfTables=256 TimeBetweenLocalCheckpoints=12 NoOfFragmentLogFiles=64 #MaxNoOfUniqueHashIndexes=768 TransactionDeadlockDetectionTimeout=12000 MaxNoOfConcurrentTransactions=20000 [MYSQLD DEFAULT] [NDB_MGMD DEFAULT] [TCP DEFAULT] [NDB_MGMD] Id=1 # the management server (this one) HostName=89.200.x.x [NDBD] Id=2 # the first storage node HostName=89.200.x.x DataDir= /var/lib/mysql-cluster StopOnError=false MaxNoOfConcurrentOperations=100000 [NDBD] Id=3 # the second storage node HostName=89.200.x.x DataDir=/var/lib/mysql-cluster StopOnError=false MaxNoOfConcurrentOperations=100000 #[NDBD] #Id=7 # the third storage node #HostName=89.200.x.x #DataDir=/var/lib/mysql-cluster #StopOnError=false #MaxNoOfConcurrentOperations=100000 [MYSQLD] Id=4 HostName=89.200.x.x [MYSQLD] Id=5 HostName=89.200.x.x [MYSQLD] Id=6 HostName=89.200.x.x
[4 Dec 2007 13:04]
James Graham
To summarize, 140 tables, 300 or so indexes across these. We use some TEXT columns sparingly. No BLOBS as far as I know. We are working through trying to optimize data types for varchar by replacing with more appropriate types where possible. Thanks
[13 Mar 2009 8:42]
Jonas Oreland
is this bug still active?
[13 Mar 2009 9:17]
James Graham
The bug was persistent, and subsequently we moved away from MySQL Cluster to a replicated platform.
[13 Mar 2009 9:54]
Jonas Oreland
Looking at traces and outfiles, i looks like swapping. this is is only a guess. i'm closing this as "can't repeat" sorry for the insufficient support for you and your application
[13 Mar 2009 9:55]
Jonas Oreland
One extra node: If you still would have been interested, the first thing to do is to upgrade to a 6.3.x release