Bug #2917 | binlog-*-table needed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 21 Feb 2004 11:04 | Modified: | 12 Sep 2022 14:44 |
Reporter: | Przemyslaw Popielarski | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Verified | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Replication | Severity: | S4 (Feature request) |
Version: | 4.0.18 | OS: | Linux (Linux 2.4.x x86) |
Assigned to: | Assigned Account | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[21 Feb 2004 11:04]
Przemyslaw Popielarski
[18 Jan 2008 11:50]
Nikola Strahija
I can confirm. For example, we smashed around 500 GB of replication data in 8 hours. The slaves just skip the tables in "replicate wild ignore table" but like you said, useless network traffic. And if you have a lot of data moving around on the master which doesn't need replication it's producing high IOwait load and network load (both on master and slave).
[13 Mar 2008 5:36]
Vikash Bucha
has this been implemented in later versions.
[19 May 2008 16:44]
Rich Kalsky
Has this been added to any later versions of MySQL? I have 5.0.27-community, and I don't see this option in the documentation.
[23 Sep 2008 2:06]
Gonzalo Carvajal
Yes! please i need that feature too. I have 4 servers, 1 master and 3 slaves. They are not in a LAN, they are in different cities. I configure the my.ini in the slave for replicating just a few tables, not all the database and very often i have replication crashes because every modification on Master is sent to the slaves, not only the tables i want. The more common error is because sql statements (until now, they´re all for tables other than i want to replicate) are not crc verified and arrive to slaves with syntax errors (wrong data). I think that is necesary some binlog-*-table option, for 2 reasons (may be there are more): 1) the type of crash i explained on top 2) because without that option and with big servers (that move a lot of data daily) there are too much (senseless) network traffic. Please sorry my english, i hope you can understand I'm working with 5.0.45-community-nt-log, MySQL Community Edition (GPL)
[6 Jul 2009 2:36]
asdasd asdasd
This feature would be great to have
[1 Sep 2009 0:14]
Peter Pan
count me in for the feature!!!
[4 Sep 2009 11:57]
Olga Turetskaya
So much in for the feature!
[4 Sep 2009 12:12]
Olga Turetskaya
Just wanted to add. I have a situation where LOAD DATA INFILE loads 16Mb files into tables. I only need to do this operation once on master and never replicate, so really cringing on the idea that I'll have to drag all that data load over the network. I think I might have found a work around with binlog-ignore-db though, but really this feature could be extremely handy :)
[30 Mar 2010 15:34]
Larsen Doe
Still not there after 6 years? =(
[30 Mar 2010 15:55]
Przemyslaw Popielarski
Yeah, still waiting :>
[8 Jun 2011 17:21]
Ben Wallach
Anybody know if this was ever implemented? I am in the same boat. I have a bunch of nightly work performed on "load" tables on the MASTER. Don't want/need this replicated across. Even with 'SQL Thread' turned off, there is a significant IO/load/performance impact on the SLAVE (during these operations). Have NOT tried adding "replicate-wild-ignore-table=myDB.myLoadTable" to SLAVE. I believe this won't matter since I have the 'SQL Thread' off anyways during these operations....can anyone confirm this?
[9 Jun 2011 14:56]
Ben Wallach
Just wanted to add that I ended up putting in "SET SQL_LOG_BIN = 0" before all load operations...this appears to have addressed the performance impacts on the slave
[3 Nov 2011 21:57]
Sheeri Cabral
Here's my vote for binlog-wild-ignore-table......replicate-wild-ignore-table is not enough for 2 different clients of ours, as their binlogs are huge (bigger than their data! One client has a 33G database, and every day produces 60 Gb of binlogs!). Is this a particularly difficult feature? It seems like many folks want it.
[3 May 2012 19:05]
Hannes Hudde
I would also like to see this feature
[13 Sep 2012 20:19]
Brian Kroth
A particular use case I have in mind for something like this is a moodle app that writes a heavy amount of (session) data to a transient table. I'd like to be able to make it an in memory table and not care about any sort of binary logging or replication. As it stands I have to have 10x as much space for the binary logging for that data as I do for the actual data since I do want to replicate everything else. Thanks, Brian
[23 Dec 2015 20:17]
Yael Goldberg
+1. This was requested over 10 years ago. Please add in this feature. It would be very useful.
[12 Sep 2022 14:37]
Yoni Sade
I second that motion. This feature will greatly reduce lag in my replication setup.
[28 Dec 2023 19:39]
Agustin Paroli
+1 This feature is very important whenever you use the binlogs as the CDC source for ETLs, as sometimes we just want to ignore a table altogether.