Bug #27726 | Exec_Master_Log_Pos is showing strange things | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 10 Apr 2007 4:06 | Modified: | 9 Sep 2008 16:52 |
Reporter: | Thomas Boehme | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Replication | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.0.36 | OS: | Linux (Debian Sarge AMD64) |
Assigned to: | Assigned Account | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[10 Apr 2007 4:06]
Thomas Boehme
[10 Apr 2007 5:35]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Thank you for a problem report. Is it possible that server crashed (or restarted for any reasons) during that period when you get your results? Then it can be something similar to http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=26540. Please, check.
[11 Apr 2007 9:05]
Thomas Boehme
I checked it. The slave does not crash. Here comes some entries from mysql error log. First slave then master server. ###SLAVE### 070402 17:50:18 mysqld started 070402 17:50:23 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 3 1006470230 070402 17:50:30 [Note] /mysql/server/mysql/bin/mysqld: ready for connections. Version: '5.0.36-standard-log' socket: '/var/tmp/mysql/mysql.sock' port: 3306 MySQL Community Edition - MC-Wetter (GPL) 070402 17:50:30 [Note] Slave SQL thread initialized, starting replication in log 'mysql-bin.000006' at position 12139540, relay log './mysql-relay-bin.000018' position: 12139677 070402 17:50:30 [Note] Slave I/O thread: connected to master 'repl@172.18.2.31:3306', replication started in log 'mysql-bin.000006' at position 12139540 ###MASTER### 070402 15:39:39 mysqld started 070402 15:39:43 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 4060760534 070402 15:39:50 [Note] /mysql/server/mysql/bin/mysqld: ready for connections. Version: '5.0.36-standard-log' socket: '/var/tmp/mysql/mysql.sock' port: 3306 MySQL Community Edition - MC-Wetter (GPL) 070402 15:39:50 [Note] Slave SQL thread initialized, starting replication in log 'mysql-bin.000001' at position 1211, relay log './mysql-relay-bin.000005' position: 977 070402 15:39:50 [Note] Slave I/O thread: connected to master 'repl@172.18.2.30:3306', replication started in log 'mysql-bin.000001' at position 1211 070402 15:42:22 [Note] Slave: received end packet from server, apparent master shutdown: 070402 15:42:22 [Note] Slave I/O thread: Failed reading log event, reconnecting to retry, log 'mysql-bin.000001' position 2324 070402 15:42:22 [ERROR] Slave I/O thread: error reconnecting to master 'repl@172.18.2.30:3306': Error: 'Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 111' errno: 2013 retry-time: 60 retries: 86400 070402 15:51:54 [Note] Slave: connected to master 'repl@172.18.2.30:3306',replication resumed in log 'mysql-bin.000001' at position 2324 070402 17:49:00 [Note] Slave: received end packet from server, apparent master shutdown: 070402 17:49:00 [Note] Slave I/O thread: Failed reading log event, reconnecting to retry, log 'mysql-bin.000002' position 43134 070402 17:49:00 [ERROR] Slave I/O thread: error reconnecting to master 'repl@172.18.2.30:3306': Error: 'Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 111' errno: 2013 retry-time: 60 retries: 86400 070402 17:51:00 [Note] Slave: connected to master 'repl@172.18.2.30:3306',replication resumed in log 'mysql-bin.000002' at position 43134 The problems I decribed in the bug report occured tonight again several times. But there is nothing in the logs.
[12 Apr 2007 7:51]
Sveta Smirnova
Please also provide your configuration files both for master and slave. We have Bug #12691 which can be related too.
[12 Apr 2007 8:54]
Thomas Boehme
For your information. My setup is a master-master-replication. Heartbeat provides a virtual IP on one systemen. All connections use this IP address and the HA-slave will never receive or serve data until there is a failover. Here is my configuration. After that comes a diff showing the configuration differences to the second system. [mysqld_safe] open-files-limit = 8192 [mysqld] basedir = /mysql/server/mysql datadir = /mysql/data old-passwords port = 3306 socket = /var/tmp/mysql/mysql.sock skip-name-resolve interactive_timeout = 3600 wait_timeout = 3600 back_log = 50 max_connections = 2000 max_connect_errors = 100000 table_cache = 2048 max_allowed_packet = 16M binlog_cache_size = 16M max_heap_table_size = 64M sort_buffer_size = 16M join_buffer_size = 16M thread_cache = 8 thread_concurrency = 8 query_cache_size = 256M query_cache_limit = 2M ft_min_word_len = 4 memlock default_table_type = INNODB thread_stack = 192K transaction_isolation = READ-COMMITTED tmp_table_size = 64M log_bin=mysql-bin relay_log=mysql-relay-bin log_warnings log_slow_queries long_query_time = 2 log_long_format tmpdir = /var/tmp/mysql server-id = 1 master-host = 172.18.2.31 master-user = repl master-password = ###PASSWORD### auto_increment_increment = 2 auto_increment_offset = 1 key_buffer_size = 64M read_buffer_size = 4M read_rnd_buffer_size = 16M bulk_insert_buffer_size = 0 myisam_sort_buffer_size = 8M myisam_max_sort_file_size = 10G myisam_max_extra_sort_file_size = 10G myisam_repair_threads = 1 myisam_recover skip-bdb innodb_additional_mem_pool_size = 16M innodb_buffer_pool_size = 12G innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:25000M;ibdata2:25000M;ibdata3:25000M;ibdata4:25000M;ibdata5:25000M;ibdata6:25000M:autoextend innodb_data_home_dir = /mysql/innodb innodb_file_io_threads = 4 innodb_thread_concurrency = 16 innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 0 innodb_fast_shutdown innodb_log_buffer_size = 16M innodb_log_file_size = 1024M innodb_log_files_in_group = 2 innodb_log_group_home_dir=/mysql/innodb_logs innodb_max_dirty_pages_pct = 90 innodb_lock_wait_timeout = 120 Here the diff: oxford: diff /tmp/oxford.cnf /tmp/cambridge.cnf 217c217 < server-id = 1 --- > server-id = 2 257c257 < master-host = 172.18.2.31 --- > master-host = 172.18.2.30 288c288 < auto_increment_offset = 1 --- > auto_increment_offset = 2 I also checked #12691. I'm not sure whether it matches my report. I don't use something like "replicate-wild-ignore-table=mysql.%". The slave also doesn't stop replication due to some errors. There aren't any. Both server run fine. Maybe it is possible that the jumpbacks in Exec_Master_Log_Pos are related to transaction BEGIN but we modify data only in auto_commit mode or using LOAD DATA INFILE. Also the jumpbacks seems to take a real big step. The binlog file in my original bug report was about 384MB but the Exec_Master_Log_Pos jumped between byte position 6.458.522, then 384.626.508 and then back to the near beginning of file at byte position 6.388.035, which is even before the first one.
[9 Aug 2008 16:52]
Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the report. You can experience same issue as bug #12691 or bug #31190 which were fixed in version 5.0.54. Please try current version 5.0.67 and inform us if bug still exists.
[9 Sep 2008 23:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".