Bug #26585 Confusing usage of the word 'row' ("in a row") to describe a sequence of events
Submitted: 23 Feb 2007 1:00 Modified: 23 Feb 2007 1:14
Reporter: Roland Bouman Email Updates:
Status: Closed Impact on me:
None 
Category:MySQL Server: Documentation Severity:S3 (Non-critical)
Version:5.1 OS:na
Assigned to: Paul DuBois CPU Architecture:Any

[23 Feb 2007 1:00] Roland Bouman
Description:
In http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/insert-speed.html, the following text is not as clear as it could be:

"INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations are very fast in MySQL, but you can obtain better overall performance by adding locks around everything that does more than about five inserts or updates in a row. If you do very many inserts in a row, you could do a LOCK TABLES  followed by an UNLOCK TABLES once in a while"

The usage of "row" is confusing (assuming that it is used to describe a succession of eventS)

How to repeat:
see In http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/insert-speed.html, the 

Suggested fix:
please reword
[23 Feb 2007 1:14] Paul DuBois
Thank you for your bug report. This issue has been addressed in the documentation. The updated documentation will appear on our website shortly, and will be included in the next release of the relevant products.

in a row -> successive