Bug #26043 | UNIQUE INDEX create always fails after constraint violation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 2 Feb 2007 20:14 | Modified: | 9 Jan 2009 9:31 |
Reporter: | Bernd Ocklin | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Cluster: Cluster (NDB) storage engine | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.1.14 | OS: | Linux (SUSE 10.1) |
Assigned to: | Assigned Account | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[2 Feb 2007 20:14]
Bernd Ocklin
[6 Feb 2007 10:07]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
verified, mysqltest test case will be upladed later additional note: with InnoDB the first ALTER TABLE failes with error 1062 instead of 1022, shouldn't both fail with the same error code?
[6 Feb 2007 11:30]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
only affects 5.1, 5.0 works fine the actual error produced by 5.1 on the 2nd ALTER TABLE is ERROR 1296 (HY000): Got error 156 'Unknown error code' from NDBCLUSTER with error 156 being #define HA_ERR_TABLE_EXIST 156 /* The table existed in storage engine */
[6 Feb 2007 11:38]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
on my note above the 1022 and 1062 error code was from a 5.0 cluster, with 5.1 the error codes are ERROR 1169 (23000): Can't write, because of unique constraint, to table 't' for cluster and ERROR 1582 (23000): Duplicate entry '12' for key 'ui_t' for InnoDB instead
[6 Feb 2007 11:53]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
mysqltest test case (requires mysqltest from at least 5.1.6)
Attachment: bug26043.tgz (application/x-gtar, text), 1.09 KiB.
[11 Oct 2007 13:23]
Morten Tryfoss
It's worth mention that the unique key is actually beeing created (you can't insert any more rows that are non-unique after the failed create).
[23 Apr 2008 13:57]
li zhou
The bug has been fixed with WL3600. Although there is a relative bug#35599, this bug should be closed.
[9 Dec 2008 9:29]
li zhou
This bug have already fixed in telco-6.4. So the bug should be closed.
[9 Dec 2008 9:33]
Jonas Oreland
is it also fixed in 6.2 and 6.3? cause we can't just defer this to 6.4...
[9 Dec 2008 10:05]
li zhou
Fixed in 6.4.0 and 6.2.16 6.3.19 still fail.
[10 Jan 2009 0:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".