Bug #19429 Recurrence of locking problems after 4.1.14
Submitted: 28 Apr 2006 21:32 Modified: 29 May 2013 6:20
Reporter: Eric Wolgemuth Email Updates:
Status: Closed Impact on me:
None 
Category:Connector / ODBC Severity:S1 (Critical)
Version:4.1.18 and 5.0 OS:Windows (Windows XP)
Assigned to: CPU Architecture:Any

[28 Apr 2006 21:32] Eric Wolgemuth
Description:
I've been using MySQL as a backend for my access app.  I had various and sundry locking "the record cannot be updated because another user has blah blah blah" that I knocked out using the suggestions here:

*  Timestamp field added to all tables
*  "Return Matching Rows" flag enabled in ODBC
*  No single floats

Unfortunately, I am volunteering at an organization where I wowed them with my original program.  I downloaded 4.1.18 and *poof* all the problems came back.  When I try to edit an existing related record and then return to the main/master record I get the "record cannot be updated..."

I tried download 5.0 and it's still broke.

I tried deleting all my existing data and starting w/fresh data, in case my data was goofy.

I'm sitting here, looking stupid and feeling *very* very frusted

How to repeat:
Create a master form with demographic data:  Name, Address blah blah
Create a detail record showing donations:  date, amount blah blah

edit text field on donation record, return to the master record and get the msg "this record has been changed by another user...."

I'm hosed
[15 May 2006 8:45] Tonci Grgin
Hi Eric. Thanks for your problem report. In order to help you I will need a dump with table structures and some example data showing this problem. I will also like to know ACCESS version and MyODBC version as well as other relevant data you can provide (SP, Access forms etc...).
[18 May 2006 21:02] Tonci Grgin
Hi. It seems that it's related to MS jet update. Please see http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=15277.
[15 Jun 2006 23:00] Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is
being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the
information that was originally requested, please do so and change
the status of the bug back to "Open".
[29 May 2013 6:20] Bogdan Degtyariov
I'm closing this bug because I can not continue without feedback from the reporter. If you have new info, please reopen the report.