Bug #18615 | mysqlhotcopy privileges should mention lock privilege | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 29 Mar 2006 14:15 | Modified: | 5 Apr 2006 19:37 |
Reporter: | Olaf van der Spek (Basic Quality Contributor) | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Documentation | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | * | OS: | Any (*) |
Assigned to: | Paul DuBois | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[29 Mar 2006 14:15]
Olaf van der Spek
[29 Mar 2006 15:30]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Thank you for a problem report. Yes, it seems obvious that LOCK TABLES priviledge is also needed and, thus, documentation should be fixed. Do you have a small test case that proves that?
[31 Mar 2006 21:46]
Olaf van der Spek
$ mysqlhotcopy -u aaa -p=aaa test ./test_copy DBD::mysql::db do failed: Access denied for user 'aaa'@'%' to database 'test' at /usr/bin/mysqlhotcopy line 470. $ 470 $dbh->do("LOCK TABLES $hc_locks");
[2 Apr 2006 7:39]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Verified just as described :) Documentation should be corrected.
[5 Apr 2006 19:37]
Paul DuBois
Thank you for your bug report. This issue has been addressed in the documentation. The updated documentation will appear on our website shortly, and will be included in the next release of the relevant product(s).