| Bug #18389 | Select statement malfunctioning. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 21 Mar 2006 13:39 | Modified: | 28 May 2013 10:56 |
| Reporter: | Fahed Bizzari | Email Updates: | |
| Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
| Category: | Connector / ODBC | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
| Version: | 4.0.25-standard | OS: | Linux (Linux) |
| Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
[21 Mar 2006 13:39]
Fahed Bizzari
[21 Mar 2006 13:56]
Fahed Bizzari
The two links got printed out incorrectly. THey should have been: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=16856 - The similar bug http://www.tm4b.com/ - Our site
[21 Mar 2006 17:14]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Thank you for a problem report. Please, send the information requested in that bug #16856: table structure, sample data etc.
[22 Mar 2006 11:07]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Please, send also the results you got and you expected.
[22 Mar 2006 11:10]
Fahed Bizzari
Thanks for the fast reply. The results included rows with status=2, when only status=0 should have been picked up.
[22 Mar 2006 11:51]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Is the problem repeatable from mysql command line client? If no, please, send a code of a test case (using ODBC calls?) that shows it. I was not able to get rows with status=2 in mysql client: mysql> select * from mt_messages where status=0 limit 25; Empty set (0.01 sec) mysql> select distinct status from mt_messages; +--------+ | status | +--------+ | 2 | +--------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from mt_messages where status=0 limit 25; Empty set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from mt_messages where status=0 limit 25; Empty set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from mt_messages where status=0 limit 25; Empty set (0.01 sec) mysql> select * from mt_messages where status=0 limit 25; Empty set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from mt_messages where status=0 limit 25; Empty set (0.00 sec)
[22 Mar 2006 11:55]
Fahed Bizzari
I do appreciate your assistance ever so much, but it is really difficult for the problem to be re-enacted as it happens irregularly. Furthermore, the data we have provided you is a tiny percentage of that which exists. I have re-indexed the status field with a hope that this rectifies the problem. I hope so! Sorry to trouble you, but i just don't think you will be able to re-enact the problem as we ourselves have not been able to (although we have logged it's bad behaviour) to reach this conclusion.
[23 Mar 2006 16:24]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Please, reopen this bug report when you'll have a test case: a set of steps that demonstrates the problem each and every time, on a latest available version of server and/or ODBC-driver.
[24 Mar 2006 5:48]
Fahed Bizzari
Thanks for the help.
[13 May 2006 23:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".
[28 May 2013 10:56]
Bogdan Degtyariov
I'm closing this bug because I can not continue without feedback from the reporter. If you have new info, please reopen the report.
