Bug #17617 | Change of time cause connection error | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 21 Feb 2006 15:27 | Modified: | 31 Mar 2014 11:00 |
Reporter: | NOT_FOUND NOT_FOUND | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Can't repeat | Impact on me: | |
Category: | Connector / J | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | 3.1.8 | OS: | Windows (WINDOWS) |
Assigned to: | Alexander Soklakov | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[21 Feb 2006 15:27]
NOT_FOUND NOT_FOUND
[22 Feb 2006 17:11]
Mark Matthews
Please post the _entire_ exception.
[22 Feb 2006 17:15]
NOT_FOUND NOT_FOUND
java.sql.SQLException: Communication link failure: java.net.SocketException, underlying cause: Software caused connection abort: recv failed ** BEGIN NESTED EXCEPTION ** java.net.SocketException MESSAGE: Software caused connection abort: recv failed STACKTRACE: java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: recv failed at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method) at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:183) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:222) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:277) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.readFully(MysqlIO.java:1370) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.reuseAndReadPacket(MysqlIO.java:1517) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:1908) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sendCommand(MysqlIO.java:1163) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:1257) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQuery(MysqlIO.java:1218) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:2239) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:2187) at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeQuery(Statement.java:1158) at com.ideas.util.DBThread.run(DBTest.java:42) ** END NESTED EXCEPTION **
[7 Mar 2006 20:09]
Mark Matthews
If I had to guess, you've "faked out" the server's timeout code. What happens if you set 'wait_timeout' on the server to some very high value (i.e. 2147483648) and test again?
[7 Apr 2006 23:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".
[31 Mar 2014 11:00]
Alexander Soklakov
I close this report as "Can't repeat" because there is no feedback for a long time and codebase is too old. Please, feel free to reopen it if the problem still exists in current driver.