Bug #14256 | definer in view definition is not fully qualified | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 24 Oct 2005 13:30 | Modified: | 9 Nov 2005 2:57 |
Reporter: | Georg Richter | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | 5.0.16 | OS: | Linux (Linux) |
Assigned to: | Per-Erik Martin | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[24 Oct 2005 13:30]
Georg Richter
[24 Oct 2005 14:36]
Mark Leith
Effecting another customer.
[27 Oct 2005 16:56]
Thomas Healy
I have this problem and I want to make certain you understand my circumstance and that it will be addressed by this fix. I use a simple create view statement on my master server like the following: CREATE VIEW order_detail AS SELECT orders.order_id AS order_id, order_items.line_number AS line_number,order_items.quantity AS quantity FROM orders, order_items WHERE orders.order_id = order_items.order_id. Once the slave tries to run it it looks like CREATE ALGORITHM=UNDEFINED DEFINER=`jumpadmin`@`%` SQL SECURITY DEFINER VIEW `order_detail` AS select `orders`.`order_id` AS `order_id`,`order_items`.`line_number` AS `line_number`,`order_items`.`quantity` AS `quantity` from (`orders` join `order_items`) where (`orders`.`order_id` = `order_items`.`order_id`) It is important that you do not have to fully qualify the user name because a fully qualified user, by definition, does not reside on my slave. Thanks.
[28 Oct 2005 10:49]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/internals/31607
[28 Oct 2005 14:21]
Per-Erik Martin
Pushed to bk 5.0.16.
[9 Nov 2005 2:57]
Paul DuBois
Noted in 5.0.16 changelog.
[31 Jan 2006 13:42]
Gabriele Faggioni
I have installed version 5.0.18 on RH linux 9, but I ve the same problem. Any suggestion?
[31 Jan 2006 14:45]
Oleksandr Byelkin
1) be sure that you do not use --skip-grant tables (if you are then use DEFINER clause) 2) if above is not your case, then submit please new bugreport with repeatable sequance of SQL statements begining from table/view creation (because it looks like you have a bit different case)