Bug #13942 | automatic FK names > 64 chars long, truncated in information schema | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 12 Oct 2005 0:02 | Modified: | 16 Apr 2019 17:17 |
Reporter: | Roland Bouman | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: InnoDB storage engine | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.0.13-rc-nt | OS: | Any (WinXP) |
Assigned to: | Sunny Bains | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[12 Oct 2005 0:02]
Roland Bouman
[12 Oct 2005 2:10]
Jorge del Conde
Thanks for your bug report. I was able to reproduce this problem using 5.0.13
[27 Oct 2005 15:27]
Sergei Glukhov
Constraint name is renamed in InnoDB part of code (see function ibool dict_table_rename_in_cache(), dict/dict0dict.c). We can't check the length of constraint name on handler level (Previous suggested fix was wrong as it can't help in case of test below). Additional test case: create table t1(ref_id int unsigned) ENGINE=innodb; create table p1(id int unsigned auto_increment primary key) ENGINE=innodb; alter table t1 add foreign key (ref_id) references p1 (id); alter table t1 rename _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567; alter table rename should give an error.
[28 Oct 2005 7:11]
Roland Bouman
Maybe anohter fix could be stretch the length of the CONSTAINT_NAME column in the information_schema database, so that you can at least have access to the full name. As I recall, dropping the constraint was not a problem, even though you need a name >64 chars to refer to it. It's just a nuisance that you cannot query the name from the information_schema, because that way, you cannot see the name of the constraint you want to drop.
[2 Nov 2005 16:38]
Mark Matthews
Indeed you can drop, but not otherwise alter the constraint: mysql> alter table _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123 drop foreign key _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123_ibfk_1; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.11 sec) Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
[3 Nov 2005 18:29]
Heikki Tuuri
Mark, hmm... maybe we should truncate the table name in the constraint name, to avoid it from exceeding 64 bytes? But why is the identifier max length only 64 bytes in MySQL? If it were longer, say 256 bytes, nobody would ever encounter this problem. Regards, Heikki
[4 Nov 2005 8:44]
Roland Bouman
Hi, just want to mention (again) that no-one will ever have any problem when you stretch the length of the CONSTRAINT_NAME columns in the INFORMATION_SCHEMA database up to 64 + 6 (length of '_ibfk_') + length of string representation of max. num. of fks per table (say, 2 digits, 99 foreign keys surely exceeds the maximum?). That is, provided you can use 72 char long identifiers in ALTER and DROP statements, this would work out fine. The only problem now is that you cannot see what constraint you would wanna ALTER or DROP, because the name is truncated in the information_schema constraint_name columns.
[4 Nov 2005 15:02]
Heikki Tuuri
Hi! the problems are: 1) truncating the table name in the generated foreign key constraint name can lead to annoying name collision problems; 2) not truncating the table name makes a constraint name id > 64 bytes long, which can make a table dump impossible to import. The solution: make CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE to fail if the generated foreign key constraint name would be >= 64 bytes long. The downside is yet another obscure foreign key error. A better solution would be to increase MySQL's max id len to 256 bytes. Then no one would bump into this problem. Regards, Heikki
[6 Sep 2006 10:04]
Heikki Tuuri
Changing the category to Information Schema.
[14 Dec 2006 20:25]
Jay Pipes
I wanted to close this bug out quickly. Can all parties agree on Heikki's recommendation: "A better solution would be to increase MySQL's max id len to 256 bytes. Then no one would bump into this problem." If so, I will put into progress and provide the fix.
[16 Dec 2006 16:20]
Roland Bouman
Jay, I guess I'm not a party as I have no decisive power. However, I do agree that Heikki's suggestion would fix it. I believe the SQL standard requires a length of 128 characters for identifiers so this would be a really safe length to go by
[24 Oct 2007 0:02]
David Heath
I have just run into this exact problem when trying to restore a backup in which an auto generated FK was greater the 64. Has this problem been fixed (hopefully using Heikki’s recommendations)? If so in which version? This is a critical problem for us, as we have clients with backup files, which can not be reloaded. David
[24 Oct 2007 0:15]
Roland Bouman
Hi David, AFAIK this has not been fixed. Assuming your dump consists of SQL statement, my suggestion would be to change the fk identifiers. It's ugly but it will solve the problem for now.
[2 Jan 2008 15:26]
David Heath
The databases we are backing up and restoring or on our clients machines and contain proprietary data which we are not permitted. Hence, it is out of the question for them to send us a backup of their project in order for us to change the fk's. Thus is a very critical bug, that if not fixed will require us to move to another DBMS.
[2 Jun 2008 13:56]
Heikki Tuuri
Raising the maximum id length in MySQL to 255 or even longer would solve many problems with too long names. Since MySQL devs do not have plans to raise it, we InnoDB devs need to come up with a solution like: *) get the first 40 chars from the table name, and catenate a random 10 char string to make it (almost) sure there will not be name collisions. Then catename the _ibfk_... to the name. Assigning this to Sunny. We may fix this in 6.0 or later.
[11 Jun 2008 16:36]
Heikki Tuuri
Note that the upcoming server-level foreign key implementation in MySQL will presumably fix also this problem.
[12 Feb 2009 21:11]
mike eldridge
what will be fixed in 6.0? the inconsistency? or the 64 character limit? microsoft's sql server and ibm's db2 both allow 128 byte identifiers. SQL92 explicitly allows up to 128 byte identifiers. i don't see why mysql should be short sighted here. i agree with heikki; it should have been 256 to begin with. starting out with these arbitrary limits is just strange. is there a way to build mysql with limits > 64 bytes? postgres has the same limit, but increasing it is as simple as modifying a def in a header. this limit breaks our schema. :/
[26 Sep 2011 19:51]
A L
Any progress on this? This limit is really a pain in the ass, and wouldn't it be really easy to increase the max length?
[26 Aug 2014 13:10]
Bill Karwin
Tested with MySQL 5.6.19, it seems to allow constraints without truncating them: mysql> CREATE TABLE `t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234` ( `id` int(11) DEFAULT NULL ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 mysql> ALTER TABLE `t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234` ADD FOREIGN KEY (id) REFERENCES foo(id); mysql> SHOW CREATE TABLE `t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234`\G *************************** 1. row *************************** Table: t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234 Create Table: CREATE TABLE `t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234` ( `id` int(11) DEFAULT NULL, KEY `id` (`id`), CONSTRAINT `t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`id`) REFERENCES `foo` (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 mysql> SELECT LENGTH('t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234_ibfk_1') AS length; +--------+ | length | +--------+ | 71 | +--------+ But interestingly, names in I_S have not been expanded: mysql> desc INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS; +--------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +--------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | CONSTRAINT_NAME | varchar(64) | NO | | | | . . . mysql> SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA='test'; . . . | def | test | t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234 | test | t234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234 | FOREIGN KEY |
[14 Nov 2017 13:06]
Federico Razzoli
Also in 8.0.3. For the following reason, I think that this is a critical bug: mysql> drop table _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123_ibfk_1; ERROR 1059 (42000): Identifier name '_123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123_ibfk_1' is too long
[9 Apr 2019 10:13]
Dmitry Lenev
MySQL 5.7.27-git still allows creation of foreign keys with too long names and is still affected by problem with I_S: CREATE TABLE _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123(ref_id INT); CREATE TABLE p(id INT PRIMARY KEY); ALTER TABLE _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123 ADD FOREIGN KEY (ref_id) REFERENCES p (id); SHOW CREATE TABLE _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123; # Table Create Table # _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123 CREATE TABLE `_123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123` ( # `ref_id` int(11) DEFAULT NULL, # KEY `ref_id` (`ref_id`), # CONSTRAINT `_123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`ref_id`) REFERENCES `p` (`id`) #) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 # Notice that constraint name is truncated! SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA='test'; # CONSTRAINT_CATALOG CONSTRAINT_SCHEMA CONSTRAINT_NAME TABLE_SCHEMA TABLE_NAME CONSTRAINT_TYPE # def test _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123 test _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123 FOREIGN KEY # def test PRIMARY test p PRIMARY KEY MySQL 8.0 (I have used 8.0.17-git) takes different approach and prohibit creation of foreign keys if generated name gets too long: CREATE TABLE _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123(ref_id INT); CREATE TABLE p(id INT PRIMARY KEY); ALTER TABLE _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123 ADD FOREIGN KEY (ref_id) REFERENCES p (id); # The above ALTER fails with ERROR 42000: Identifier name '_123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123_ibfk_1' is too long DROP TABLE _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123; CREATE TABLE c(ref_id INT, FOREIGN KEY (ref_id) REFERENCES p (id)); RENAME TABLE c TO _123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123; # The above RENAME fails with ERROR 42000: Identifier name '_123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123_ibfk_1' is too long Since too long names are not allowed there is no problem with showing them in INFORMATION_SCHEMA. The scenario with RENAME TABLE has been addressed by fix for bug#24666169 "I_S.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS.CONSTRAINT_NAME IS NOT UPDATED AFTER RENAME TABLE" in MySQL 8.0.1 (and CREATE TABLE scenario was addressed even before that). Because of the above I am closing this bug as fixed in 8.0.1. Moving it to Documenting state to let Documentation Team to decide if it makes sense to add it to release notes.
[16 Apr 2019 17:17]
Daniel Price
Posted by developer: Fixed as of the 8.0.1 release, and here's the changelog entry: An automatically generated foreign key constraint identifier that exceeded the 64 character limit appeared truncated in the INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS CONSTRAINT_NAME column. Automatically generated foreign key constraint identifiers can no longer exceed the 64 character limit.