Bug #13865 | MySQl Conn. raises a wrong exception on connect | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 8 Oct 2005 15:34 | Modified: | 13 Oct 2005 21:20 |
Reporter: | Federico Giampietro | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | Connector / NET | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | 1.0.6 | OS: | Server 2003 |
Assigned to: | Reggie Burnett | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[8 Oct 2005 15:34]
Federico Giampietro
[9 Oct 2005 11:39]
Vasily Kishkin
Sorry...I was not able to reproduce the bug. TableEditor works fine. Could you please create your simple test case and attach it ?
[10 Oct 2005 8:19]
Federico Giampietro
System description: MySQL server: 5.13 O.S.: Server 2003 SP1 Hardware: 4 * Xeon 3GHz
[11 Oct 2005 9:38]
Vasily Kishkin
I guess This is problem of SP1 of Windows 2003. Could you please test it on another Windows ?
[11 Oct 2005 17:22]
Federico Giampietro
Not now, sorry. //Federico
[12 Oct 2005 11:52]
Federico Giampietro
Tested on another system with 2 * Pentium III + Server 2003 SP1: same result. Sorry but here no 2003 without SP 1. This is not a production server, but a developer machine. Then, if you like, I can give you a remote acces to the system and his developing environment using Remote Desktop to make some test. Byte, Federico.
[13 Oct 2005 21:20]
Reggie Burnett
Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at http://www.mysql.com/documentation/ and the instructions on how to report a bug at http://bugs.mysql.com/how-to-report.php Additional info: Federico I believe you have VS.Net set to break on all exceptions instead of unhandled exceptions. Because the socket class is brain dead in .NET, we are using an exception to implement async connect with timeout. This is expected and is not a problem although not ideal. If you feel differently, please let me know your thoughts. We can discuss it further.
[13 Oct 2005 21:54]
Federico Giampietro
Ok, tnx for explain, but I think this is a problem, because when a developer uses the debugger to debug his application, it stops on your exception. I know that support async connect on .NET is hard (I implemented a complete socket class), but I think that your way is wrong. Try to use delegate instead. Regards, Federico.
[14 Oct 2005 13:48]
Reggie Burnett
Federico First, it will only stop here if you have the debugger set to stop at all thrown exceptions instead of unhandled ones. Most devs do not run like this. Second, my original implementation used a delegate. This doesn't work because in a heavily loaded system it quickly uses up all the threads in the thread worker pool and connections start failing. The only other implementation strategy involves pinvoking to winsock. I have a working implementation of that but I have not go around to making that work on Mono.
[14 Oct 2005 15:30]
Federico Giampietro
Hello Reggie, confirm thath my debugger is set to catch any exception. This because I'm working on a very big application and often I need to stop on handled exceptions too. No problem, I'll continue to debug with the old 1.0.5 (I think this relese uses delegate because all is ok). Bye, Federico.