Bug #12814 | Nonguarded option should be splitted into two ones | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 25 Aug 2005 19:43 | Modified: | 6 Dec 2007 15:28 |
Reporter: | Alexander Nozdrin | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Won't fix | Impact on me: | |
Category: | Instance Manager | Severity: | S4 (Feature request) |
Version: | OS: | Any | |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
Tags: | Instance Manager |
[25 Aug 2005 19:43]
Alexander Nozdrin
[3 Nov 2005 9:12]
mike mike
also see my latest comment here: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=14318 i believe there might be a need for multiple configuration parameters.
[24 Jan 2006 6:18]
Kenneth Girrard
I support a change in how the Instance manager interacts with each instance. I spent two weeks trying to figure out what the logged MySQL_Instance_M access denied messages were from; I was quite surprised to find these were normal behavior. My normal reaction when I find an application log file saturated with access denied messages is to look for a problem. Learning that this was normal behavior only made me realize how unintuitive it was. Unless connecting to a database requires significantly more resources than a failed attempt, I would suggest that the monitoring of an instance occur through some other means entirely, or through a documented, parameter-specified user in the database, one which should be set up with minimal privileges for this purpose only. (Could the password be extracted from the mysqlmanager.passwd file so it doesn't have to appear in my.cnf?) Lack of this supporting configuration should result in an error being recorded in the mysqlmanager log, and the instance being left unmonitored (but started and stopped appropriately). This would be much preferred over having to either sacrifice Instance Manager's monitoring (by setting the interval to a huge value, which I have done) or have instances unguarded, which is not acceptable since they aren't started.