Bug #11985 | timeout doesn't work as expected | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 16 Jul 2005 20:52 | Modified: | 12 Dec 2005 12:12 |
Reporter: | [ name withheld ] | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Duplicate | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 4.0.24 | OS: | Linux (Gentoo) |
Assigned to: | Assigned Account | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[16 Jul 2005 20:52]
[ name withheld ]
[2 Aug 2005 9:54]
Aleksey Kishkin
we need some way to reproduce it. Can you suggest us testcase? What clients did you use for that connections? Could you try binaries from our web site (not gentoo port ) ?
[2 Aug 2005 12:33]
[ name withheld ]
We have standard mysql client Ver 12.22 Distrib 4.0.24 and php 4.3.11 compiled with "--with-mysql=/usr". This problem doesn't exist in Kernel 2.4.x with linux_threads. We can reproduce this bug with 100% efficiency on 2.6.x kernel with nptl threads. Please write what else do you need to know to look into this issue.
[2 Aug 2005 12:46]
[ name withheld ]
I'm sure MySQL binary from your website will work good, because I guess It comes with linux_threads or without any multi-threads.
[3 Aug 2005 17:45]
[ name withheld ]
I've checked one more thing todays: timeouts works in 2.6.x kernel with linux_threads, so problem is caused by using Native POSIX Thread Library for Linux.
[12 Dec 2005 12:12]
Aleksey Kishkin
duplicate http://bugs.mysql.com/15679
[12 Jan 2006 4:13]
Jaakko Heusala
Hi! I have the same problem with Linux 2.6.14.5 (patched with grsec) and MySQL 4.0.24 using Debian package mysql-server (4.0.24-10sarge1). We used the same MySQL binary with Linux 2.4 kernel on our webserver but the problem started when we changed to Linux 2.6. At the same time MySQL seemed to start using threads because now there is only three processes running.
[13 Jan 2006 10:27]
Struan Bartlett
I experienced the same problem on a dual-processor Dell PE2850 running kernel 2.6.13. Reverting the kernel to 2.4.29 resolves the problem.
[21 Nov 2006 23:53]
James Day
If you're seeing this problem please comment on bug #11897 instead. That's the one where active work is going on. Also note that bug #9678 fixed in 4.0.28, 4.1.22, 5.0.25 and 5.1.12 might have fixed this, so try those or later versions and comment abotu whether it works in bug #11897.