Bug #113644 | Confusing thread id vs processlist id information in SEIS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 15 Jan 14:13 | Modified: | 15 Jan 15:59 |
Reporter: | Przemyslaw Malkowski | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Verified | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: InnoDB storage engine | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 8.0 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[15 Jan 14:13]
Przemyslaw Malkowski
[15 Jan 14:43]
MySQL Verification Team
Hi Mr. Malkowski, Thank you for your bug report. However, we are not certain what are you reporting here. First of all, do note that both thread and process ID are including in the P_S output. Where several threads belong to the same process ID , then thread ID is repeated. Could you give us an example of what should SEIS look like, in your opinion and why ..... Also, do set a Category correct. It is either Performance_Schema or InnoDB. Do also note that 5.7 is no longer supported. We are waiting on your feedback. This also looks like a feature request, don't you agree ????/
[15 Jan 15:39]
Przemyslaw Malkowski
Hi MySQL Verification Team, There is nothing wrong with the performance_schema.threads view. My point is that in SEIS, we can see "MySQL thread id" information for a given active transaction. Now, if someone wants to find out what this thread id is about, they will look at the THREAD_ID column in the P_S view, which is basically NOT what one should be looking for. SEIS, in fact, shows the processlist ID, and IMHO, it should be described as such. Don't you agree? So, no, I don't think it's a feature request; I think it was inconsistently named in the first place.
[15 Jan 15:59]
MySQL Verification Team
Hi, Thank you. This is definitely an insignificant bug and discrepancy between SEID and P_S. However, it is still a bug in the code, so we are verifying it. For versions 8.0 and higher.