Bug #113401 | Manual on locking reads inaccurately describes use case | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 12 Dec 2023 16:17 | Modified: | 12 Dec 2023 18:05 |
Reporter: | Bill Karwin (Candidate Quality Contributor) (OCA) | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Verified | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Documentation | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 8.2 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[12 Dec 2023 16:17]
Bill Karwin
[12 Dec 2023 16:25]
MySQL Verification Team
HI Mr. Karwin, Thank you for your bug report. However, this is their primary use ...... Can you let us know how would you like us to describe the locking reads, instead ??? We are waiting on your feedback.
[12 Dec 2023 16:26]
MySQL Verification Team
Mr. Karwin, Simply, what should our Manual describe as the primary use of the locking reads ????? Thanks in advance.
[12 Dec 2023 17:51]
Bill Karwin
I would describe the use of locking reads this way: You can use locking reads to avoid race conditions, by serializing read or write access to rows that your session needs. You can implement pessimistic locking on a case by case basis, instead of using coarse solutions such as table locks.
[12 Dec 2023 18:05]
MySQL Verification Team
Hi Mr. Karwin, We fully agree with your description. This report is now a verified Documentation bug. Thank you for your contribution !