Bug #109808 | DatabaseMetaData#getPrimaryKeys should ordered by COLUMN_NAME | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 27 Jan 2023 5:20 | Modified: | 24 Mar 2023 21:04 |
Reporter: | Jin Kwon | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | Connector / J | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 8.0.32 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
Tags: | DatabaseMetaData, getPrimaryKeys |
[27 Jan 2023 5:20]
Jin Kwon
[27 Jan 2023 8:13]
MySQL Verification Team
Hello Jin Kwon, Thank you for the report and feedback. regards, Umesh
[18 Mar 2023 2:53]
Jin Kwon
Here comes another results. PrimaryKey( super=com.github.jinahya.database.metadata.bind.PrimaryKey@3a1238cc{ unmappedValues=null }, tableCat=performance_schema, tableSchem=null, tableName=session_account_connect_attrs, columnName=PROCESSLIST_ID, keySeq=1, pkName=PRIMARY ) PrimaryKey( super=com.github.jinahya.database.metadata.bind.PrimaryKey@c19799b8{ unmappedValues=null }, tableCat=performance_schema, tableSchem=null, tableName=session_account_connect_attrs, columnName=ATTR_NAME, keySeq=2, pkName=PRIMARY )
[24 Mar 2023 21:04]
Daniel So
Posted by developer: Added the following entry to the C/J 8.0.33 changelog: "Results returned by the getPrimaryKeys method of the DatabaseMetadata interface were not sorted by COLUMN_NAME as required by the JDBC specification."