Bug #22425 | Prepared Statements fail to correctly bind parameters | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 17 Sep 2006 14:30 | Modified: | 22 Jan 2007 17:10 |
Reporter: | Christopher Schultz | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Can't repeat | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Prepared statements | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 4.1.21 | OS: | Linux (Linux 2.6.14 and 2.6.17) |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[17 Sep 2006 14:30]
Christopher Schultz
[17 Sep 2006 15:24]
Christopher Schultz
Here's a small test that I wrote to verify that I wasn't crazy. It looks like the problem is prepared statement parameter replacements, 'cause strings used with java.sql.Statement objects seem to work. I used my 'test' database (which has a 'db' character set of latin1, as opposed to my real database, which says that it is 'utf8'). ========= SQL SETUP ========= CREATE TABLE `user` ( `username` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '' ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 ; insert into user values ('foo'); insert into user values ('bar'); insert into user values ('baz'); insert into user values ('chris'); ========= Java Code ========= import java.sql.*; public class JDBCTest { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"); Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://localhost/test?characterEncoding=utf8&dumpQueriesOnException=true", "user", "password"); System.out.println("==========================="); System.out.println("Using Statement"); System.out.println("==========================="); Statement s = conn.createStatement(); ResultSet rs = s.executeQuery("SELECT * from user WHERE username='chris'"); dump(rs); rs.close(); rs = null; s.close(); s = null; System.out.println("==========================="); System.out.println("Using PreparedStatement"); System.out.println("==========================="); PreparedStatement ps = conn.prepareStatement("SELECT * from user WHERE username=?"); ps.setString(1, "chris"); rs = ps.executeQuery(); dump(rs); } private static void dump(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException { ResultSetMetaData rsmd = rs.getMetaData(); for(int i=0; i<rsmd.getColumnCount(); ++i) { System.out.print(rsmd.getColumnName(i + 1) + "\t"); } System.out.println(); if(rs.next()) { do { for(int i=0; i<rsmd.getColumnCount(); ++i) { String value = rs.getString(1+i); if(rs.wasNull()) value = "NULL"; System.out.print(value + "\t"); } System.out.println(); } while(rs.next()); } else { System.out.println("NO RESULTS"); } } }
[17 Sep 2006 15:28]
Christopher Schultz
Okay, the problem appears to be with server-side prepared statements. Adding "useServerPrepStmts=false" fixes my problem. Of course, this is just a workaround; there's either a bug or misconfiguration somewhere. Let me know if I can help out with any kind of testing or giving you guys more information to help solve this problem.
[18 Sep 2006 0:26]
Ben Anderson
Hello Christopher, We're experiencing a similar issue (I've raised bug #22290). The workaround we've opted for is to use the JDBC connection parameter 'jdbcCompliantTruncation=false'. This stops the warning from being turned into an exception by the JDBC driver. Ben
[18 Sep 2006 2:02]
Christopher Schultz
Although the error I was getting was "data truncation error", I think the problem has more to do with the server-side prepared statements. For example, I was getting an error inserting "192.168.1.50" into a VARCHAR(15) field, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense. It looks like a character set issue, even though all the character sets of the client, server, database, and table were all the same.
[18 Sep 2006 11:16]
Tonci Grgin
Hi Christopher and thanks for your problem report. This is not a bug. If you turn on general log in your MySQL server you'll notice STRICT_TRANS_TABLES is being set. We introduced 'STRICT_TRANS_TABLES' server mode because it's much more efficient than checking warnings after every statement for truncations. You can still use jdbcCompliantTruncation=false, or check other connector/J options (like ServerSidePreparedStatement...).
[18 Sep 2006 12:29]
Christopher Schultz
I'm afraid I don't understand. I was getting an error inserting "192.168.1.50" into a VARCHAR(15) field, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense (12 chars is less than 15, so why get a truncation error?). Also, by turning off server-side prepared statements, I was able to work around my problem. If you run my test program, you'll notice that the SELECT query DOES NOT WORK when using server-side prepared statements. All it does is do a SELECT ... WHERE col=?. This is definitely a bug as far as I'm concerned. Perhaps I should have changed the description to "server side prepared statements do not work", because that is what the bug turns out to be. The data truncation turned out to be a side-effect of the problem. Please re-examine.
[19 Sep 2006 22:22]
Christopher Schultz
The data truncation exception was a symptom of the real problem: server site prepared statements do not work properly. Please re-examine.
[20 Sep 2006 10:16]
Tonci Grgin
Hi Christopher. I will attach my test case and my.ini you can find in BUG#22290 (minus strict_trans_tables ofcourse). I was unable to repeat your problem on: MySQL server 4.1.22BK and 5.0.24BK on WinXP Pro SP2 localhost JDK 1.5.07 Latest sources of c/J 3.1 from SVN repo &jdbcCompliantTruncation=true&useServerPrepStmts=true&characterEncoding=utf8 Test results (I also tried varying statements, this is just last text): Connected to 5.0.24-log Query to be executed: com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement[1] - INSERT INTO testbug22425 VALUES ('tonci') Query to be executed: com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement[2] - INSERT INTO testbug22425 VALUES ('tonci 10.192.192.99') Query to be executed: com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement[3] - SELECT * from testbug22425 WHERE username LIKE 'tonci%' Dumping data... username tonci tonci 10.192.192.99 Time: 0,546 OK (1 test) Connected to 4.1.22-log Query to be executed: com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement[1] - INSERT INTO testbug22425 VALUES ('tonci') Query to be executed: com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement[2] - INSERT INTO testbug22425 VALUES ('tonci 10.192.192.99') Query to be executed: com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement[3] - SELECT * from testbug22425 WHERE username LIKE 'tonci%' Dumping data... username tonci tonci 10.192.192.99 Time: 0,625 OK (1 test) Could you please upgrade to latest nightly snapshot from http://downloads.mysql.com/snapshots.php and retest?
[20 Sep 2006 10:17]
Tonci Grgin
Test case
Attachment: TestBug22425.java (text/x-java), 2.46 KiB.
[20 Sep 2006 13:25]
Christopher Schultz
You might not be able to repeat it because you are using a different version of MySQL server. Did you run my test as-is, or write your own? From your sample output, it's not clear if you were using prepared statements or not. Also, I was not using a LIKE query, but an exact string match (=) instead. I may be wrong, but strict_trans_tables looks like an option only available after MySQL 5.0.2 (according tottp://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/server-sql-mode.html), so what does it matter if it is disabled? I will be glad to download and install the nightly build of MySQL 4.1.22 as long as it is (relatively) safe to run two versions of MySQL against the same set of tables (of course, only one at a time).
[20 Sep 2006 13:39]
Tonci Grgin
Christopher, I'll try to answer your questions. - I am obliged to use latest server version in my tests but I don't think that matters here. - I made my own test (attached to the report) according to our SOP. - I used PS, LIKE, = and many variants of them. LIKE is just last thing I tried. - strict_trans_tables is mentioned because I used my.ini from another bug report tested on 5.0 and this should be removed from *that* my.ini to test on 4.1 - I refered to nightly build of connector/J not MySQL server
[20 Sep 2006 14:09]
Christopher Schultz
My apologies; I was unclear about which component to try a snapshot. Trying Connector/J snapshots are much easier than upgrading MySQL ;) Okay, I have run this same test using Connector/J nightly 20060920 with the same results (or lack thereof). For whatever reason, using prepared statements parameter replacement like this: ps.setString(1, "username") results in a query that returns no results for me. When I turn off server-side prepared statements, everything works as expected. Is there a way I can get some more debugging output? I have turned on "profileSQL" and everything looks okay to me: the prepared statement is "prepared" as I would expect (i.e. the text looks right) and then the execution includes the query as I expect (i.e. "WHERE username='chris'").
[11 Oct 2006 5:29]
Vidur Dhanda
I experienced the same problem with MySQL 5.0.24a and Connector/J 3.1.13. I then experienced the same problem with MySQL 5.0.26 and Connector/J 5.0.3 -- the latest GA releases. By specifying useServerPrepStmts=false in the JDBC URL, the problem disappeared. In my case, I was inserting values into a DECIMAL(15,2) column in an InnoDB table using a PreparedStatement. The value, as a Double, 72028.43 would caues a Data truncation whereas 62028.43 would not. I spent the better part of the day researching this problem. There are a lot of posts about suppressing the exception (jdbcCompliantTruncation=false) and diableing strict mode. But the problem, I believe, is in ServerPreparedStement.
[11 Oct 2006 6:45]
Tonci Grgin
Hi Vidur. Your problem is not related *directly* to this report. There was a problem with DECIMAL parameters but it's solved. Please search Bugs DB (BUG#22290 + BUG#22869 for example) and use latest connector/J snapshot. Hi Christopher. There is one more thing you can do. You can set up local SVN repo (use TortoiseSVN or any ther client) from following URL's: http://svn.mysql.com/svnpublic/connector-j/branches/branch_3_1/connector-j or http://svn.mysql.com/svnpublic/connector-j/branches/branch_5_0/connector-j and test from inside Eclipse. There you'll see all that's happening in connector. Probably you are hitting something closely connected to your configuration.
[11 Oct 2006 21:54]
Christopher Schultz
If you give me the rest of your test case (the attched test case is incomplete as it does not include the testsuite.BaseTestCase class or code), I'll see if it fails on my setup. There is one question that I just can't seem to get you to answer: why does this work when I turn off server-side prepared statements, but fails when I turn them on. That's the only variable that is being changed, here. I've updated my test so that it does not even require a table. Executing a simple "SELECT ? AS broken" will fail with using a parameterized server-side prepared statement. It works when the prepared statement is handled on the client side. I have even gone so far as to uninstall MySQL and destroy all databases and tables, re-build it from source, and re-try the attached testcase, and it still fails (even without re-installing my own databases). I have also asked others to try the same test case on other instances of MySQL that they have available, and nobody else can reproduce it. :( I realize that you cannot reproduce this bug (and apparently only one other person in the world can do it). That probably means that I have some small difference in configuration to everyone else. Given a completely fresh 4.1.21 build from Gentoo-patched sources, with no configuration changes and alterations to the stock mysql and test databases that come with MySQL out-of-the-box, my test case fails in my environment. I would love to figure this out. Please help me get more information from either MySQL or the driver. Turning on "traceProtocol" doesn't seem to get me anything. I feel like me stepping through the code in a debugger is sort of a waste, since I don't know how the code (or protocol) works in the first place. If you can direct me to add a ton of logging or something that I can turn over to you for analysis, I'd love to do that. I just think I'm underqualified to this kind of analysis myself.
[11 Oct 2006 21:56]
Christopher Schultz
Test case that can demonstrate this bug in my environment.
Attachment: JDBCTest.java (application/octet-stream, text), 2.53 KiB.
[11 Oct 2006 21:59]
Christopher Schultz
Added my simplified test case (requires no tables). When I run it like this on my freshly rebuilt MySQL 4.1.21 environment, I get the following output: $ java -classpath .:mysql-connector-java-3.1.13.jar -Dusername=root -Dpassword= -DuseServerPrepStmts=false JDBCTest Using connection string: jdbc:mysql://localhost/test?characterEncoding=utf8&dumpQueriesOnException=true&profileSQL=false&traceProtocol=false&useServerPrepStmts=false =========================== Using Statement =========================== works non-blank string =========================== Using PreparedStatement =========================== works non-blank string =========================== Using Parameterized PreparedStatement =========================== broken non-blank string $ When I run this test and turn on server-side prepared statements using the system property I rigged, I get this output: $ java -classpath .:mysql-connector-java-3.1.13-bin.jar -Dusername=root -Dpassword= -DuseServerPrepStmts=true JDBCTest Using connection string: jdbc:mysql://localhost/test?characterEncoding=utf8&dumpQueriesOnException=true&profileSQL=false&traceProtocol=false&useServerPrepStmts=true =========================== Using Statement =========================== works non-blank string =========================== Using PreparedStatement =========================== works non-blank string =========================== Using Parameterized PreparedStatement =========================== broken $ Note the blank line after "broken" at the end, there. I checked, and it returns a 0-length string, there.
[13 Oct 2006 20:26]
Christopher Schultz
C version of same (failing) test
Attachment: mysql_test.c (application/octet-stream, text), 2.50 KiB.
[13 Oct 2006 20:31]
Christopher Schultz
I added another test case, this time using the C API. Whatever is going on, it's not a Java or Connector/J problem, so this bug should probably be either re-assigned (and re-described), or closed and re-opened as a new bug (which I am happy to do, since the description is now totally wrong). I have confirmed this behavior on another Gentoo Linux system that I manage, so if it is a configuration issue, then it is a common one across these two systems. I am happy to provide full configuration information to help resolve this issue. Finally, I am attempting to reproduce this in a VMware instance in order to demonstrate the problem in a way that can be transferred to you so you can actually see it ;) Would that be helpful?
[15 Oct 2006 15:10]
George Lefter
I have encountered the same problem when trying to use a prepared statement to insert a row. I have tested both Connector/J 3.1.13 and 5.0.3 with mysql-4.1.21 and got the same result. The stacktrace below is from Connector/J 5.0.3. CREATE TABLE `users` ( `user_id` char(200) default NULL, `username` char(200) default NULL, `password` char(200) default NULL ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; public class MySQLTest { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Class.forName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"); Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:mysql://localhost/jbossdb", "jboss", "seam"); String sql = "insert into users(user_id, username, password) values(?, ?, ?)"; PreparedStatement ps = con.prepareStatement(sql); ps.setString(1, "x"); ps.setString(2, "y"); ps.setString(3, "z"); ps.execute(); } } Exception in thread "main" com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlDataTruncation: Data truncation: Data truncated for column 'username' at row 1 at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.convertShowWarningsToSQLWarnings(SQLError.java:717) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.scanForAndThrowDataTruncation(MysqlIO.java:3031) at com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement.serverExecute(ServerPreparedStatement.java:1241) at com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement.executeInternal(ServerPreparedStatement.java:685) at com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.execute(PreparedStatement.java:790) at MySQLTest.main(MySQLTest.java:18)
[16 Oct 2006 9:04]
Tonci Grgin
Christopher, can you post output from following statements (in mysql cl client): prepare pr1 from 'select ? as col1'; set @v1='some string'; execute pr1 using @v1; My output is just fine: C:\mysql\bin>mysql -uroot test -T Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 2 to server version: 4.1.22-log Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> prepare pr1 from 'select ? as col1'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) Statement prepared mysql> set @v1='some string'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec) mysql> execute pr1 using @v1; Catalog: 'def' Database: '' Table: '' Name: 'col1' Type: 254 Length: 11 Max length: 11 Is_null: 0 Flags: 1 Decimals: 0 +-------------+ | col1 | +-------------+ | some string | +-------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> As for your C API test case, it is faulty. I am checking it now.
[16 Oct 2006 11:05]
Tonci Grgin
Christopher, I am attaching VS2005 solution so you can try it. You will need debug version of libmysql.dll put in Debug\ folder for things to work. If you don't have VS there's compiled exe in Debug\ folder (again, debug version of libmysql.dll needed). Test case is basically quick rework of your test so you should be familiar with it.
[16 Oct 2006 11:07]
Tonci Grgin
VS 2005 project, mind the paths!
Attachment: bug22425.zip (application/x-zip-compressed, text), 186.84 KiB.
[16 Oct 2006 13:26]
Christopher Schultz
Your mysql-client test case seems to work. ------------------------------------------ Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 122 to server version: 4.1.21-log Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> prepare pr1 from 'select ? as col1'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) Statement prepared mysql> set @v1='some string'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql> execute pr1 using @v1; +-------------+ | col1 | +-------------+ | some string | +-------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql>
[16 Oct 2006 13:30]
Christopher Schultz
I'm running Gentoo Linux for my server. Should I attempt to install the client programs on a Windows box and test over the network? I intentionally rigged my C program to connect using sockets (using 127.0.0.1 instead of "localhost") to mimin my Connector/J circumstances. I would imagine that testing from another machine would still be okay. Does the "Windows Essentials" package have the server and everything else included? I'd prefer not to actually install anything. I'll try the non-installer version and just unzip it somewhere convenient. I'll also try to dig up a win32 C compiler ;)
[16 Oct 2006 13:46]
Tonci Grgin
Hi Christopher. Essential has the C developer files without debug information so it's not suitable. Anyway, you do not need to test on Windows. Linux test with gcc /path_to/test_case.c -o /path_to/test_case -L/path_to/lib/mysql -I/path_to/include/mysql -lmysqlclient_r -lz LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path_to/lib/mysql ./path_to/test_case is just fine by me. Did you cross-examine your code with mine? I tried to mark all changes I did to your original. >Your mysql-client test case seems to work. >------------------------------------------ So it seems not to be server issue...
[16 Oct 2006 14:25]
Christopher Schultz
I get the same (broken) output: status: Init status: Connect status: init prepared statement status: prepare statement status: bind parameters status: set param string to 'non-empty-string' status: executing statement status: binding result to buffers status: store result status: fetch row RESULTS Expected one result ('non-empty-string'). Got: '' status: close statement status: Disconnect I checked-over your changes, and it looks like you added full metadata use and printing, much more like my orignial Java-based example. I did notice a change to the setting of params[0].buffer_length which shouldn't matter since it's an IN parameter. The C API documentation suggests that MYSQL_STMT.buffer_length is irrelevant for IN-only parameters. At any rate, this test still fails for my setup. I'm currently building a VMWare-based virtual machine that will hopefully be able to reproduce this bug for you. Not sure how to get it to you, though, since it will be maybe 500MB. :(
[18 Oct 2006 7:37]
Tonci Grgin
Christopher, thanks for youe efforts. I'm waiting on results.
[18 Oct 2006 12:45]
Christopher Schultz
Tonci, Not sure what feedback you need. I compiled and ran your modified test and got the same (broken) output on my setup.
[18 Oct 2006 18:13]
Tonci Grgin
Christopher, > I'm currently building a VMWare-based virtual machine that will hopefully be able to reproduce this bug for you. I would like to see this happen on clean machine since I think that could give us a better idea.
[18 Oct 2006 18:58]
Christopher Schultz
I finished building the VM the other day, and it appears to work as expected. :( Strange that I have two environments that fail and one (which I attempted to match as closely as possible) that does not. The only difference right now between the VM and the "real" machines that I have that I can think of is the kernel itself. I have not yet re-built the kernel with AMD Athlon-specific optimizations in it. I've been trying, but I need to hit a sweet spot of optimizations that I know I need versus device drivers that need to exist for it to work in the VM itself.
[19 Oct 2006 10:22]
Tonci Grgin
Christopher, thanks for your efforts. I'm not convinced this is x64 issue but will try it myself on AMDx64 and FC 5. Waiting on more info from you.
[19 Oct 2006 13:08]
Christopher Schultz
This isn't x64. This is AMD k7 Athlon XP. Both machines having this problem are Athlon XP (32-bit) machines. I'm hosting the VM on yet another 32-bit AMD Athlon XP processor. The two servers exhibit the problem but the VM does not. The only difference I can detect is the kernel.
[19 Oct 2006 15:56]
Charles Whittington
I have a similar problem too - has any further light been thrown on what the cause is? The statement is as follows: int result = stmnt.executeUpdate(Query.toString()); The platform is as follows: ( I am going to try others) +-----------------+ | version() | +-----------------+ | 4.1.21-standard | +-----------------+ 1 row in set (0.66 sec) mysql-connector-java-5.0.3-bin.jar The message is as follows: Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlDataTruncation: Data truncation: Data truncated for column 'CodeID' at row 1 at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.convertShowWarningsToSQLWarnings(SQLError.java:717) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.scanForAndThrowDataTruncation(MysqlIO.java:3031) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:1812) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:3118) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:3047) at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeQuery(Statement.java:1166) at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.convertShowWarningsToSQLWarnings(SQLError.java:710) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.scanForAndThrowDataTruncation(MysqlIO.java:3031) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:1812) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:3118) at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:1313) at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:1232) at General_Classes.General_Model.add(General_Model.java:362) ... 27 more
[19 Oct 2006 16:31]
Christopher Schultz
Charles, You'll have to post more information than that. For example, if you have a field that should accept 5 characters, and you're trying to insert 10 characters, then you are seeing expected behavior. Please read all the comments in this bug... it really has nothing to do with data truncation.
[19 Oct 2006 18:04]
Charles Whittington
I am sorry I forgot to add the query, which I will do when I have time but I cannot now reproduce it. Meanwhile, I have gone back to mysql-connector-java-3.0.14-production-bin.jar and all is well again. I suppose it is possible that I was trying to truncate data and that 3.0.14 doesn't report it - is that possible? [Off-topic: It is a pity that the messages do not incorporate the query text. Comment also applies to Syntax error messages which only give from the first token which mysql thinks is wrong. I assume this is the server rather than the driver, though. It makes life hard for those of us who construct queries on the fly] Charles Whittington
[19 Oct 2006 18:15]
Mark Matthews
Putting the query text in error messages by default is considered "information leakage", which is a security hazard. However, if you add "dumpQueriesOnException=true" to your JDBC URL configuration properties, the driver will do what you're asking for, even for prepared statements (it's not enabled by default).
[19 Oct 2006 18:53]
Christopher Schultz
Charles, According to http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/cj-news-3-1-0.html, server-side prepared statements were added in the 3.1 versions of the connector. It looks like the data truncation became an error (at least in ResultSet.getX()) in 3.1.4: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/cj-news-3-1-4.html Perhaps switching back to 3.0.x simply avoids the "problem". Try turning off server-side prepared statements as suggested in this bug and let us know if that fixed the problem.
[19 Oct 2006 18:54]
Charles Whittington
OK thanks - looks useful. I have switched back to 5.0.3 for alpha testing and will report if it happens again. Charles Whittington
[20 Oct 2006 9:29]
Charles Whittington
OK. This is what I am getting with 5.0.3: When adding a row to a table with an int(10) autoincrement column, CodeID, I am supplying CodeID='' and it is complaining about truncation, which 3.0.x driver certainly didn't. You may well ask why I am supplying CodeID='' to an autoincrement column and it is because the query is being generated. This will probably be fixed at some stage, but if this information helps you find the problem, you are welcome! We are going back to 3.0.x for the time being unless/until you ask for more tests. Charles Whittington The Code: con = new JDCConnectionPool().getConnection(); stmnt = con.createStatement(); Query = new StringBuffer(30); . . generate the Query . ResultSet Rs = stmnt.executeQuery(Query.toString()); . . etc The SQLException: <my reporting> followed by: Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Data truncation: Data truncated for column 'CodeID' at row 1 Query being executed when exception was thrown: SHOW WARNINGS Query being executed when exception was thrown: insert into CodeValue set Value='' , TableName='' , CodeID='' , EllsoUserID='1' , Notes='' , AuthorID='1' , UsedBy='Members Panel' , CodeName='UserInstrumentsAny Instrument' , RoleID='' at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.convertShowWarningsToSQLWarnings(SQLError.java:717) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.scanForAndThrowDataTruncation(MysqlIO.java:3031) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:1812) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:3118) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:3047) at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeQuery(Statement.java:1166) at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.convertShowWarningsToSQLWarnings(SQLError.java:710) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.scanForAndThrowDataTruncation(MysqlIO.java:3031) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:1812) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.execSQL(Connection.java:3118) at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:1313) at com.mysql.jdbc.Statement.executeUpdate(Statement.java:1232) at General_Classes.General_Model.add(General_Model.java:362) ... 27 more This is the table desc: +-------------+------------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------------+------------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+ | CodeID | int(10) unsigned | | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | CodeName | text | YES | | NULL | | | Notes | text | YES | | NULL | | | UsedBy | text | YES | | NULL | | | TableName | text | YES | | NULL | | | Value | text | YES | | NULL | | | EllsoUserID | int(10) unsigned | YES | | NULL | | | RoleID | int(10) unsigned | YES | | NULL | | | DateChanged | timestamp | YES | | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP | | | AuthorID | int(11) | YES | | NULL | | +-------------+------------------+------+-----+-------------------+----------------+ 10 rows in set (0.24 sec)
[20 Oct 2006 13:25]
Christopher Schultz
Charles, Can you download and run some of the tests that are attached to this bug? (Look under the "Files" section). My tests in Java anc C both compile with everything provided. Tonci's Java test has external dependencies, so that won't work for you, but his C test will. Can you try one of them out? My Java test will run a series of queries, the last of which fails on my setup. Check the code for the system properties which control connection information. The test does not require any tables, and is a read-only test. Finally, please post the details of your system configuration: OS type (and kernel version and distro name if Linux), MySQL Server version, and Java version. Thanks.
[19 Jan 2007 7:34]
Tonci Grgin
Christopher, I am closing this report as "Can't repeat". I hope you've found what's wrong with your config by now. One final word on my test; please see comment (and URL's) about our public SVN repository. If you connect to our source repo from inside Eclipse you'll be able to run all of our c/J test cases. Regards
[19 Jan 2007 17:12]
Christopher Schultz
An upgrade to MySQL 5.0 on one of the affected systems has apparently fixed the bug. I'm not sure if was a compiler setting or what, but anyone who is having this problem should upgrade and test: it worked for me. Of course, another option is to use client-side prepared statements instead of server-side prepared statements. Doing this with the Connector/J library is easy... I'm not sure about libraries for other languages.
[21 Jan 2007 20:53]
Tonci Grgin
Hi Christopher. Can you be more specific of versions you used to bypass this problem? My guess is it might help someone.
[22 Jan 2007 17:10]
Christopher Schultz
This bug actually has nothing to do with Connector/J or "SQLException: Data truncated for column". I have adjusted this bug accordingly. This affected me with the following configuration: - AMD x86 hardware (2 different machines with the same problem) - Gentoo Linux (kernel version 2.6.17) - MySQL 4.1.21 - built from source through Gentoo's portage package manager - Connection through TCP/IP or socket (using "127.0.0.1" or "localhost") both fail. Gentoo-specific environment information: - Gentoo profile: "default-linux/x86/2006.1/server" and "default-linux/x86/2006.1" - Use flags for MySQL: +berkdb +perl +ssl -(everything else) - Not sure which patches were applied (see below for 4.1.22 patches) Both Java and C clients fail to properly prepare statements. This is not a problem with the client library. I'm currently trying an upgrade to 4.1.22. Same USE flags as above. Patches: * using '010_all_default-dir-4.1.15.patch' * > Move config directory to the gentoo default * using '030_all_thrssl-4.1.21.patch' * > Link libmysqlclient_r against ssl * using '035_x86_asm-pic-fixes-4.1.12.patch' * > remove page relocations * > Most part of the original patch has already been accepted by MysQL, * > here is the remaining. * > _many_ thanks to pageexec@freemail.hu * using '040_all_tcpd-vars-fix-4.0.14.patch' * using '105_all_mysql_config_cleanup.patch' * > fix bug #156301 mysql_config wrongly retains too much info from CFLAGS * using '200_all_query-logging-bypass-4.1.19.patch' * > Fix bug #128713 * > dev-db/mysql: Query Logging Bypass Vulnerability (CVE-2006-0903) * using '700_all_mysqldump-missing-cfgfile-fix-4.1.21.patch' * > Add configuration section for mysqldump * using '701_all_rpl000015-portsobst-fix-4.1.21.patch' * > normalize port 3306 in tests * 010_all_default-dir-4.1.15.patch ... [ ok ] * 030_all_thrssl-4.1.21.patch ... [ ok ] * 035_x86_asm-pic-fixes-4.1.12.patch ... [ ok ] * 040_all_tcpd-vars-fix-4.0.14.patch ... [ ok ] * 105_all_mysql_config_cleanup.patch ... [ ok ] * 200_all_query-logging-bypass-4.1.19.patch ... [ ok ] * 700_all_mysqldump-missing-cfgfile-fix-4.1.21.patch ... [ ok ] * 701_all_rpl000015-portsobst-fix-4.1.21.patch ... [ ok ] After this build and a MySQL restart (to startup the new version), this issue has been corrected; that is, my test programs run properly. An upgrade to MySQL 5.0 also results in the successful execution of my test programs -- both in C and Java. The bottom line is that 4.1.21 is a bum version of MySQL. There are other problems with it (like ORDER BY doesn't work in some cases) and it basically should not be used for any reason. Fortunately, there's another production-ready version in the 4.1 line available that solves many of these problems.