Bug #905 | REPLICATION SETUP PROBLEM | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 24 Jul 2003 1:40 | Modified: | 24 Aug 2003 4:45 |
Reporter: | Andrew Sitnikov | Email Updates: | |
Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Replication | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | 4.0.14 | OS: | Linux (Linux/SuSE) |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[24 Jul 2003 1:40]
Andrew Sitnikov
[24 Jul 2003 4:45]
Guilhem Bichot
Hi! How to repeat: 1. (master & slave) Install 4.0.14 Was it a fresh install on the slave, or had MySQL already been installed on the slave before? 2. (master) mysqlhotcopy db_name --noindices --resetmaster --flushlog --resetmaster will delete all binlogs and create a new binlog (.001) so you don't need --flushlog on top of it. 3. (master) scp db_name_copy into 4. (slave) myisamchk -r dn_name/*.MYI ( This possibly made the master and slave's data become different (if myisamchk -r actually had to repair some hidden corruption in the table). You should rather run myisamchk -r on the master, then do the scp. So that the master and slave have exactly the same data for sure before replication starts. 5. (slave) start mysqld 6. cat error.log Version: '4.0.14-standard' socket: '/tmp/mysql.sock' port: 3306 030724 2:44:23 Slave I/O thread: connected to master 'replica@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:3306', replication started in log 'FIRST' at position 4 ERROR: 1062 Duplicate entry '44520' for key 1 030724 2:44:24 Slave: error 'Duplicate entry '44520' for key 1' on query 'INSERT INTO online_status (date, date2, number) VALUES (NOW(), NOW(), NULL)', error_code=1062 This says that the slave could not insert a row with number 44520 (like it was inserted on the master) because there was already such a row in the slave's table. So this is either a bug in MySQL, or a misuse on your side. If you can find a simple way to repeat it (a table on the master, exactly the same table on the slave, then queries which cause the slave to give an error), then this is very probably a bug and we would appreciate to have the table and queries to reproduce the problem on our side. Thanks for your help. Guilhem
[14 Feb 2005 22:54]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".