Bug #69458 | rpl.rpl_deadlock_innodb test failing in 5.5.32 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 13 Jun 2013 9:19 | Modified: | 26 Nov 2013 9:04 |
Reporter: | Honza Horak (OCA) | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | Tests: Replication | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.5.32 | OS: | Linux |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[13 Jun 2013 9:19]
Honza Horak
[13 Jun 2013 9:51]
Honza Horak
After digging a bit more into it I see many suppression of this kind of error in several test cases: mysql-5.5.32/mysql-test/lib/v1/mtr_report.pl: /InnoDB: Error: table `test`.`bug29807` does not exist in the InnoDB internal/ or mysql-5.5.32/mysql-test/lib/v1/mtr_report.pl: /InnoDB: Error: table `test`.`t[12]` does not exist in the InnoDB internal/ or mysql-5.5.32/mysql-test/suite/parts/t/partition_debug_innodb.test:call mtr.add_suppression("InnoDB: Error: table .* does not exist in the InnoDB internal"); mysql-5.5.32/mysql-test/suite/parts/r/partition_debug_innodb.result:call mtr.add_suppression("InnoDB: Error: table .* does not exist in the InnoDB internal"); mysql-5.5.32/mysql-test/include/mix1.inc:call mtr.add_suppression("InnoDB: Error: table .test...bug29807. does not exist in the InnoDB internal"); mysql-5.5.32/mysql-test/include/mtr_warnings.sql: ("InnoDB: Error: table `test`.`t[123]` does not exist in the InnoDB internal"), So is that something expected and we should only suppress that warning?
[13 Jun 2013 10:29]
MySQL Verification Team
Hello Honza, Thank you for the report. Verified as described. Thanks, Umesh
[26 Nov 2013 9:04]
Erlend Dahl
A fix for this was pushed in 5.5.35, 5.6.16, 5.7.3. Please open a new bug if a similar issue occurs.