| Bug #52193 | Failed to read auto-increment value from storage engine | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 18 Mar 2010 19:56 | Modified: | 30 May 2013 6:21 |
| Reporter: | Louis Breda van | Email Updates: | |
| Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
| Category: | Connector / ODBC | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
| Version: | 5.1.6 | OS: | Windows (VISTA64) |
| Assigned to: | Lawrenty Novitsky | CPU Architecture: | Any |
| Tags: | Auto-increment, inodb, ODBC5 | ||
[18 Mar 2010 19:56]
Louis Breda van
[18 Mar 2010 20:07]
Louis Breda van
Hello, I just discoverd that: - goting to the administrator gui - table maintenance - optimize tables Solves the problem for ...... a little while (not for long) Louis
[6 Apr 2010 10:12]
Tonci Grgin
Hi Louis and thanks for your report. I'm thinking about this problem, will let you know when I come up with something meaningful.
[7 Apr 2010 8:10]
Tonci Grgin
Louis, Can you please try with current GA so we can exclude MySQL server problem here? Also, I would require complete test case for this so we can try to repeat it. Finally, I think you're referring to http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=35602 and http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?22,242704,242704#msg-242704. Posting new report in ODBC category while Sunny is waiting on you in original report makes little sense... Can you please respond to Sunny in Bug#35602 before we proceed.
[7 Apr 2010 9:23]
Lawrenty Novitsky
Possibly makes sense to try not with different(GA) server version, but just with different engine if possible(i.e. MyISAM instead of InnoDB). People on forum say that they experienced problem with GA mysql server. So I guess test with different engine would even be more indicative to exclude ODBC here(or exclude InnoDB :))
[7 May 2010 23:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".
[30 May 2013 6:21]
Bogdan Degtyariov
I'm closing this bug because I can not continue without feedback from the reporter. If you have new info, please reopen the report.
