Bug #49836 Replication of geometric fields is broken after WL#5151
| Submitted: | 21 Dec 2009 4:29 | Modified: | 7 Mar 2010 23:58 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reporter: | Alfranio Tavares Correia Junior | Email Updates: | |
| Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
| Category: | MySQL Server: Row Based Replication ( RBR ) | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
| Version: | 5.1-rep+2 | OS: | Any |
| Assigned to: | Luis Soares | CPU Architecture: | Any |
| Tags: | geometric types, RBR | ||
[21 Dec 2009 4:29]
Alfranio Tavares Correia Junior
[21 Dec 2009 19:34]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/95307 3144 Luis Soares 2009-12-21 BUG#49836: Replication of geometric fields is broken after WL#5151 Metadata for geometric fields was not being properly stored by the slave in its the table definition. This happened because MYSQL_TYPE_GEOMETRY was not included in the 'switch... case' that handles field metadata according to the field type. Therefore, it would default to 0, leading to always have a mismatch between master's field and slave fields'. We fix this by deploying the missing 'case MYSQL_TYPE_GEOMETRY:'.
[24 Dec 2009 1:08]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/95593 3148 Luis Soares 2009-12-24 BUG#49836: Replication of geometric fields is broken after WL#5151 Metadata for geometric fields was not being properly stored by the slave in its the table definition. This happened because MYSQL_TYPE_GEOMETRY was not included in the 'switch... case' that handles field metadata according to the field type. Therefore, it would default to 0, leading to always have a mismatch between master's field and slave fields'. We fix this by deploying the missing 'case MYSQL_TYPE_GEOMETRY:'. @ mysql-test/extra/rpl_tests/type_conversions.test Added some tests for blob fields and also the particular case for replicating from/into BLOB into/from GEOMETRY. @ sql/field.h As requested by Mats, reverted function added by him in changeset: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/95313
[7 Jan 2010 9:03]
Zhenxing He
see also bug#48776
[18 Jan 2010 12:06]
Bugs System
Pushed into 6.0.14-alpha (revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118120357-hnzhgadkpzqfnvsc) (version source revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118115413-kd3klpine09yyktw) (merge vers: 6.0.14-alpha) (pib:16)
[18 Jan 2010 12:07]
Bugs System
Pushed into mysql-next-mr (revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118120111-73dulkgc893it4r9) (version source revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118115335-0stecyzftqm7bqx6) (pib:16)
[19 Jan 2010 11:18]
Jon Stephens
Documented bugfix in the 5.6.0 and 6.0.14 changelogs, as follows:
Metadata for GEOMETRY fields was not properly stored by
the slave in its definitions of tables.
Set NDI state, waiting for merges to 5.1+.
[2 Mar 2010 12:04]
Bugs System
Pushed into 5.1.41-ndb-6.3.33 (revid:martin.skold@mysql.com-20100302115132-qhkzoqk0ksqgziiv) (version source revid:martin.skold@mysql.com-20100302115132-qhkzoqk0ksqgziiv) (merge vers: 5.1.41-ndb-6.3.33) (pib:16)
[2 Mar 2010 12:05]
Bugs System
Pushed into 5.1.41-ndb-7.0.14 (revid:martin.skold@mysql.com-20100302120047-al65h1bcqmd3cem0) (version source revid:martin.skold@mysql.com-20100302115137-ewrkhhxkkj0q1yza) (merge vers: 5.1.41-ndb-7.0.14) (pib:16)
[3 Mar 2010 5:03]
Jon Stephens
Also documented in the NDB-6.3.33 and 7.0.14 changelogs. NDI: Will this go into 5.1 mainline or not?
[3 Mar 2010 14:51]
Jon Stephens
No additional pushes expected; closed.
[6 Mar 2010 10:51]
Bugs System
Pushed into 5.5.3-m3 (revid:alik@sun.com-20100306103849-hha31z2enhh7jwt3) (version source revid:vvaintroub@linux-rbsx-20100118220048-5vnyqi5ghsbgmdsd) (merge vers: 5.5.99-m3) (pib:16)
[7 Mar 2010 23:58]
Paul DuBois
Moved 5.6.0 changelog entry to 5.5.3.
Portions of this website are copyright © 2001, 2002 The PHP Group
Page generated in 0.047 sec. using MySQL 8.4.7-u6-cloud
Timestamp references displayed by the system are UTC.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the
respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance
by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of
Oracle or any other party.