Bug #49259 | Slave I/O thread could not register on master | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 1 Dec 2009 13:10 | Modified: | 8 Mar 2010 8:29 |
Reporter: | Serge Kozlov | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Replication | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | mysql-next-mr | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | Luis Soares | CPU Architecture: | Any |
Tags: | error 1105, slave, versional replication |
[1 Dec 2009 13:10]
Serge Kozlov
[1 Dec 2009 13:49]
Serge Kozlov
Fix for item 1 from steps: ./bin/nuts.pl --build=/path/to/5.1-bugteam --build=/path/to/5.1-rep+3 --buildorder=0,1 --test=replication.
[9 Dec 2009 15:51]
Serge Kozlov
It happens for pair mysql-5.1-bugteam (master) and mysql-next-mr (slave) so the internal tag TEAMTREE should be removed.
[18 Dec 2009 2:55]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/94877 3127 Luis Soares 2009-12-18 BUG#49259: Slave I/O thread could not register on master The slave thread changed the format of the information it used to connect to the master after patch for BUG 13963. This resulted in old master getting confused, thence rejecting the slave connection attempt. In particular, patch for BUG 13963 removed the rpl_recovery_rank variable which was, at that time, packed together with the rest of the information which the slave would use to register itself on the master. Based on this data, the master would then assert that the number of bytes received in the connection command was consistent to what it was expecting. Therefore, given that a slave, patched with the aforementioned patch, would not pack the four bytes related to the rpl_recovery_rank variable, the old master would reject the connection attempt. It would assume that the data was inconsistent (fewer bytes than it was expecting) and return an error. We fix this by faking an rpl_recovery_rank variable when registering the slave on the master. In practice this reverts a small part of patch for BUG 13963, the one related to the slave connecting to the master. @ sql/repl_failsafe.cc Added bypassing of removed rpl_recovery_rank variable information in packet. This should also make more sense when old servers connect to a new master (ie, master with patch for BUG 13963). If this was not done, the new master could interpert information an old slave sends as master_id, when in fact it could be the rpl_recovery_rank data. @ sql/slave.cc Faking a rpl_recovery_rank so that we can register as a slave in an old master.
[18 Jan 2010 12:06]
Bugs System
Pushed into 6.0.14-alpha (revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118120357-hnzhgadkpzqfnvsc) (version source revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118115413-kd3klpine09yyktw) (merge vers: 6.0.14-alpha) (pib:16)
[18 Jan 2010 12:07]
Bugs System
Pushed into mysql-next-mr (revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118120111-73dulkgc893it4r9) (version source revid:alik@ibmvm-20100118115335-0stecyzftqm7bqx6) (pib:16)
[19 Jan 2010 10:01]
Jon Stephens
Documented bugfix in the 5.6.0 and 6.0.14 changelogs as follows: Due to a change in the format of the information used by the slave to connect to the master, which could cause to reject connection attempts to older masters by newer slaves. Set NDI state, waiting for additional merges.
[6 Mar 2010 11:03]
Bugs System
Pushed into 5.5.3-m3 (revid:alik@sun.com-20100306103849-hha31z2enhh7jwt3) (version source revid:vvaintroub@linux-rbsx-20100118220048-5vnyqi5ghsbgmdsd) (merge vers: 5.5.99-m3) (pib:16)
[8 Mar 2010 0:01]
Paul DuBois
Moved 5.6.0 changelog entry to 5.5.3.