| Bug #46764 | Manual bug with Cluster rollbacks | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 17 Aug 19:50 | Modified: | 6 Nov 21:02 |
| Reporter: | Andrew Hutchings | ||
| Status: | Closed | ||
| Category: | Server: Docs | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
| Version: | 5.1+ | OS: | Any |
| Assigned to: | Jon Stephens | Target Version: | |
| Triage: | Needs Triage: D4 (Minor) | ||
[17 Aug 19:50]
Andrew Hutchings
[21 Aug 15:07]
Jon Stephens
The portion of the Manual quoted above *already* says that it's no longer necessary to issue an explicit ROLLBACK in the event of duplicate-key and suchlike errors; "no longer necessary to perform explicit ROLLBACK" implies "an implicit ROLLBACK occurs instead". Any other interpretation is simply not logical (AFAICT), so I don't see what's at issue. Thanks!
[21 Aug 15:17]
Jonas Oreland
i'm with andrew here, the 3 times I read the wording, i always interpreted it as we behave like innodb, i.e don't abort transaction, but simple rollback statement.
[6 Nov 21:02]
Jon Stephens
Thank you for your bug report. This issue has been addressed in the documentation. The updated documentation will appear on our website shortly, and will be included in the next release of the relevant products. See also BUG#32656.
