Bug #37153 | NDB Cluster reports affected rows incorrectly | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 3 Jun 2008 9:03 | Modified: | 26 Sep 2008 15:42 |
Reporter: | Max Mether | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Cluster: Cluster (NDB) storage engine | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
Version: | CGE >= 6.3.11 | OS: | Any |
Assigned to: | Frazer Clement | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[3 Jun 2008 9:03]
Max Mether
[3 Jun 2008 10:30]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
Can't reproduce with ndb-6.3.10, building ndb-6.3.14 now
[3 Jun 2008 19:13]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
ndb-6.3.14 does indeed show 1 affected row, not zero now building 6.3.11-13 to see where this changed ...
[3 Jun 2008 21:28]
Hartmut Holzgraefe
ndb-6.3.10 is the last OK version, the problem exists starting with ndb-6.3.11
[24 Sep 2008 8:52]
Geert Vanderkelen
Doesn't have to be a DELETE, UPDATE shows problem too, on an empty table (using current 6.3bzr): mysql> update t1 set vc='something' where id = 28; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec) Rows matched: 1 Changed: 1 Warnings: 0
[24 Sep 2008 15:22]
Frazer Clement
Fix pushed to 6.3.18 and 6.4.0
[26 Sep 2008 15:42]
Jon Stephens
Documented in the 5.1.28-ndb-6.3.18 changelog as follows: A statement of the form 'DELETE FROM table WHERE primary_key=value' or 'UPDATE table WHERE primary_key=value' where there was no row whose primary key column had the stated value appeared to succeed, with the server reporting that 1 row had been changed. This issue was only known to affect MySQL Cluster NDB 6.3.11 and later NDB 6.3 versions.