| Bug #36568 | Adjust Init Start/Stop Script to Start Multiple Agents on the Same Server | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 7 May 2008 15:29 | Modified: | 9 Jan 2015 14:33 |
| Reporter: | Chris Calender | Email Updates: | |
| Status: | Won't fix | Impact on me: | |
| Category: | MySQL Enterprise Monitor: Agent | Severity: | S4 (Feature request) |
| Version: | All | OS: | Any |
| Assigned to: | Jan Kneschke | CPU Architecture: | Any |
| Tags: | init script, mem, multiple agents, start multiple agents, start script, stop script | ||
[7 May 2008 15:29]
Chris Calender
[8 Jun 2009 19:21]
Kay Roepke
I cannot see how this should work. The init.d script cannot guess the naming scheme of the config files reliably, and it is a very simple change to the init.d script to make it work today.
[8 Jun 2009 20:54]
Simon Mudd
Please first if you are going to support multiple instances running on the same server at the same time, and if you wish that these instances are started at the same time when the system is started. If you want this I would suggest something like the oracle /etc/oratab (see http://www.orafaq.com/faq/what_is_oratab_and_what_is_it_used_for) file which basically has something to name an agent instance, it's path, the user to use and then whether it should be started on boot or not. Then make the system start stop script use this file to determine which individual instances should be started. The agent installers would then add an entry to the /etc/"merlintab" file if the entry does not exist. It would also allow you to start or stop an agent by name rather than having to worry about a full path to the local init script. You could even adjust this concept so that if the installer is run from a non-root account a $HOME/etc/"merlintab" would be used instead, thus maintaining a consistent behaviour. The "global" init script would then be used as whatevername start whatevername status whatevername stop whatevername restart all of these commands working on all "active" instances, but taking an optional "agent instance name" which would only affect the given name. You could make the names start at merlin1, merlin2, .... unless some installation parameter is used to define a specific agent instance name. This would be me functional description of what would be useful.
[11 Aug 2014 13:07]
Daniƫl van Eeden
With the 3.0 agent it's possible to monitor multiple instances with one agent. Do we still need multiple agents? Perhaps if instances should report to different mem servers?
[11 Aug 2014 15:58]
Simon Mudd
I did use multiple agents reporting to different MEM servers in the past in MEM2. That required some magic to tunnel one proxy connection thought the other one but it did work in my dev environment. However, I don't see that MEM really supports this and wonder if we should just accept it won't work, or that they document clearly what to expect. (I'm not sure this is clearly documented one way or another). I no longer need this functionality.
