| Bug #3064 | get "Unknown Table" error when using ORDER BY with UNION | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 4 Mar 2004 12:24 | Modified: | 24 Mar 2004 7:52 |
| Reporter: | Nathan Jensen | ||
| Status: | Closed | ||
| Category: | Server | Severity: | S1 (Critical) |
| Version: | 4.0 | OS: | Microsoft Windows (Windows) |
| Assigned to: | Sinisa Milivojevic | Target Version: | |
[4 Mar 2004 12:24]
Nathan Jensen
[4 Mar 2004 13:03]
Dean Ellis
Verifying against 4.1.2/Linux, with a similar issue in 4.0.19. The question really is what the final ORDER BY is sorting. Documentation implies that it should be the second SELECT as parentheses have not been used to seperate the ORDER BY from the individual SELECT, although it seems to be getting applied to either the total set or the first SELECT (depending on which version is used). USE mysql; SELECT host FROM user AS b UNION SELECT host FROM user ORDER BY user.host; SELECT host FROM user AS b UNION SELECT host FROM user ORDER BY b.host; In 4.0.19, the first query fails with unknown table; second succeeds. In 4.1.2, both fail with unknown table. Whether or not there is a behavioral/technical bug here, the documentation for UNION needs to better cover this topic.
[22 Mar 2004 10:03]
Sinisa Milivojevic
ChangeSet info: hangeSet 1.1730.1.31 2004/03/22 16:35:15 Sinisa@sinisa.nasamreza.org union.result:
[24 Mar 2004 7:52]
Sinisa Milivojevic
Patch pushed in 4.0.19
