| Bug #30307 | mysql-proxy crashes with: file network-mysqld-proto.c: line 94 (network_mysqld_p | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 8 Aug 2007 13:58 | Modified: | 7 Oct 2007 7:38 |
| Reporter: | Jeremy Kusnetz | Email Updates: | |
| Status: | No Feedback | Impact on me: | |
| Category: | MySQL Proxy | Severity: | S1 (Critical) |
| Version: | 6.0 | OS: | Linux (Slackware 10.0) |
| Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
[8 Aug 2007 13:58]
Jeremy Kusnetz
[8 Aug 2007 14:00]
Jeremy Kusnetz
strace of crash
Attachment: mysql-proxy-bug30307-strace.txt (text/plain), 23.08 KiB.
[9 Aug 2007 20:01]
Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the report. I can not repeat described behaviour with revision 153 and other Tunnel tool (SSHKeychain). Please indicate revision number you get error with and provide command you use to run stunnel.
[6 Sep 2007 20:13]
Jeremy Kusnetz
Sorry for the delay on this, the last one I tried was 200. This proxy was compiled with 5.0 libraries, but it's a 4.1 client talking to it. I saw a message on the forums that this could happen with a 4.1 client? There isn't much in the stunnel command line, it's using a conf file. There isn't anything special in the config, just listens on one port, stunnels to another server on another port.
[7 Sep 2007 7:38]
Sveta Smirnova
Thank you for the feedback. I still can not repeat described behaviour with revision 225. Please try with this revision and if you can repeat provide step-by-step instruction how you set up the environment.
[24 Sep 2007 13:04]
Aleh Filipovich
I have the same problem with the latest release mysql-proxy-0.6.0-linux-rhas4-x86 when put PowerDNS to use mysql-proxy as a backend. There are about 6000 records in PowerDNS database.
[24 Sep 2007 13:06]
Aleh Filipovich
I have the same problem with the latest release mysql-proxy-0.6.0-linux-rhas4-x86 when put PowerDNS to use mysql-proxy as a backend. There are about 6000 records in PowerDNS database.
[7 Oct 2007 23:00]
Bugs System
No feedback was provided for this bug for over a month, so it is being suspended automatically. If you are able to provide the information that was originally requested, please do so and change the status of the bug back to "Open".
