Bug #26265 | Full text search for entries with ampersand returns nothing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 11 Feb 2007 7:46 | Modified: | 7 Mar 2007 13:11 |
Reporter: | Dan Cavina | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Won't fix | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: FULLTEXT search | Severity: | S4 (Feature request) |
Version: | 5.0 | OS: | Windows (Windows XP) |
Assigned to: | CPU Architecture: | Any | |
Tags: | ampersand |
[11 Feb 2007 7:46]
Dan Cavina
[12 Feb 2007 10:55]
Valeriy Kravchuk
Thank you for a problem report. Sorry, but it looks like expected behaviour. Please, read the manual, http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/server-system-variables.html (about ft_boolean_syntax). '&' is treated as operator.
[12 Feb 2007 20:01]
Dan Cavina
I should have also mentioned that this occurs even if the text containing the ampersand is enclosed in quotes. I would expect that any symbol contained within the quotes would not special behavior.
[6 Mar 2007 15:29]
Ben Byrne
I'm having the same problem on Debian running 4.1.11 (in fact, it was even a search for "AT&T" that brought the problem to my attention. As per the documentation, I have changed the value of ft_boolean_syntax to remove the ampersand, first via SET GLOBAL VARIABLE, and then through editing my.cnf. At present, ft_boolean_syntax = + -><()~*:""^| So there is no longer an ampersand present, it has been replaced by a carat. Unfortunately, this has not resolved the problem -- a boolean fulltext search for "AT&T" still returns no values. Either I misunderstood the documentation on ft_boolean_syntax, or this should be reclassified as a bug.
[6 Mar 2007 18:54]
Dan Cavina
The ability to search for company names such as "AT&T" and "M & K Speakers" in text fields is pretty important. I am changing the status to Open hoping this can be looked at again.
[7 Mar 2007 13:11]
Sergei Golubchik
We cannot change the fulltext parser in 5.0. In 5.1 a fulltext parser can be in a plugin, and any behaviour can be implemented by the user.
[8 Mar 2007 22:19]
Ben Byrne
Perhaps the documentation on ft_boolean_syntax should be updated to reflect that there's not much point in changing its value, then?