| Bug #25734 | union and parentheses | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Submitted: | 20 Jan 2007 17:34 | Modified: | 22 Jan 2007 17:35 |
| Reporter: | Nikolas Garofil | ||
| Status: | Won't fix | ||
| Category: | Server: Parser | Severity: | S2 (Serious) |
| Version: | 5.0.30-Debian_3-log | OS: | Linux (Debian) |
| Assigned to: | Marc Alff | Target Version: | |
| Tags: | parantheses, UNION, error, query, bfsm_2007_04_05 | ||
| Triage: | D4 (Minor) | ||
[20 Jan 2007 17:34]
Nikolas Garofil
[20 Jan 2007 19:05]
Sveta Smirnova
Please do not submit the same bug more than once. An existing bug report already describes this very problem. Even if you feel that your issue is somewhat different, the resolution is likely to be the same. Because of this, we hope you add your comments to the original bug instead. Thank you for your interest in MySQL. Same cause as in the bug #21904, so I marked it as duplicate Duplicates bug #21904
[22 Jan 2007 17:35]
Marc Alff
Re-Opening the report. The problem in Bug#21904 is different from the one found here. - in Bug#21904, a IN ((subselect)) is parsed correctly, but executed as a scalar subquery where it should be executed as a table subquery. - in this report, the IN clause is not of the form IN ((subselect)), but of the form IN(subselect), with a subselect that contains a join. The parser fails to read the subselect properly (ERROR 1064), so the root cause affecting this report is different from Bug#21904. There is an issue with parsing subselects that starts with a parenthesis.
[5 Feb 2007 19:51]
Marc Alff
See related bug#14654
[30 Mar 2007 18:23]
Marc Alff
See related bug#21614
[30 Mar 2007 18:25]
Konstantin Osipov
Bug#21614 "UNION in views" was marked a duplicate of this bug.
[3 Apr 2007 18:25]
Marc Alff
See related Bug#4805
[4 Apr 2007 16:20]
Damien Katz
I will be working to this bug soon.
[22 Sep 2008 21:59]
Sveta Smirnova
Bug #39589 was marked as duplicate of this one.
