Bug #14274 | having clause with aggregate as boolean value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 24 Oct 2005 21:30 | Modified: | 13 Jan 2006 0:02 |
Reporter: | Martin Friebe (Gold Quality Contributor) (OCA) | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | MySQL Server: Optimizer | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 5.1.15 / 4.1.14 | OS: | Windows (Windows / freebsd / *) |
Assigned to: | Igor Babaev | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[24 Oct 2005 21:30]
Martin Friebe
[8 Jan 2006 7:00]
Bugs System
A patch for this bug has been committed. After review, it may be pushed to the relevant source trees for release in the next version. You can access the patch from: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/749
[12 Jan 2006 6:54]
Igor Babaev
hangeSet 1.2472 06/01/07 23:00:06 igor@rurik.mysql.com +3 -0 Fixed bug #14274: a query with a having clause containing only set function returned a wrong result set. sql/sql_select.cc 1.445 06/01/07 22:59:56 igor@rurik.mysql.com +1 -1 Fixed bug #14274: a query with a having clause containing only set function returned a wrong result set. It happened because processing of the set functions in having started with a call of the split_sum_func method, instead of the split_sum_func2 method. mysql-test/t/having.test 1.13 06/01/07 22:59:56 igor@rurik.mysql.com +12 -0 Added a test case for bug #14274. mysql-test/r/having.result 1.14 06/01/07 22:59:56 igor@rurik.mysql.com +13 -0 Added a test case for bug #14274. Fix will appear in 4.1.16, 5.0.20
[13 Jan 2006 0:02]
Mike Hillyer
Entry added to 4.1.16/5.0.20 changelogs: <listitem> <para> Using an aggregate function as the argument for a HAVING clause would result in the aggregate function always returning <literal>FALSE</literal>. (Bug #14274) </para> </listitem>
[13 Jan 2006 17:51]
Paul DuBois
The changelog versions are actually 4.1.17 and 5.0.19.